1 00:00:10,880 --> 00:00:13,400 PROFESSOR: So now that we've discussed prevalence and risk 2 00:00:13,400 --> 00:00:16,650 scenarios, we come to a very important topic, 3 00:00:16,650 --> 00:00:20,060 which is, when should you impose the guideline? 4 00:00:20,060 --> 00:00:25,490 Obviously, when the epidemic is raging at a very high rate, 5 00:00:25,490 --> 00:00:27,830 it feels out of control, it's spreading, 6 00:00:27,830 --> 00:00:30,660 we want to impose the guideline that we've discussed, 7 00:00:30,660 --> 00:00:32,630 which limits the indoor reproductive number 8 00:00:32,630 --> 00:00:34,800 for each space within some tolerance. 9 00:00:34,800 --> 00:00:37,580 And that would, for example, give us some number N1 10 00:00:37,580 --> 00:00:39,860 from the safety guideline, R N less than 11 00:00:39,860 --> 00:00:42,250 epsilon, which is going to be smaller 12 00:00:42,250 --> 00:00:44,420 than the normal occupancy of that room for a given 13 00:00:44,420 --> 00:00:47,640 time and all the other factors that we've been discussing. 14 00:00:47,640 --> 00:00:49,600 But what happens as the prevalence of infection 15 00:00:49,600 --> 00:00:50,140 goes down. 16 00:00:50,140 --> 00:00:52,840 Generically, there must be some curve like this. 17 00:00:52,840 --> 00:00:55,330 And we'd like to understand what is the simplest 18 00:00:55,330 --> 00:00:58,330 reasonable model we can come up with that can tell us 19 00:00:58,330 --> 00:01:00,220 how to relax the approximation? 20 00:01:00,220 --> 00:01:02,590 So for example, let's think of a school or a business, 21 00:01:02,590 --> 00:01:05,140 where we typically have a lot of the same people there 22 00:01:05,140 --> 00:01:08,120 every day, but some others are coming and going, 23 00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:10,420 or maybe going home and getting infected and coming in. 24 00:01:10,420 --> 00:01:12,520 So the rate of infection is low. 25 00:01:12,520 --> 00:01:15,060 So we expect typically the number of infected people 26 00:01:15,060 --> 00:01:16,940 is zero or occasionally one. 27 00:01:16,940 --> 00:01:19,960 And as the prevalence goes down, then we 28 00:01:19,960 --> 00:01:24,200 start to see that the situation is getting safer and safer. 29 00:01:24,200 --> 00:01:26,890 So that at a certain point P1, where we start to say, 30 00:01:26,890 --> 00:01:28,480 you know what we can actually increase 31 00:01:28,480 --> 00:01:30,640 the occupancy of the space with everything else held 32 00:01:30,640 --> 00:01:32,840 fixed while still wearing masks. 33 00:01:32,840 --> 00:01:34,390 And then we hit the normal occupancy. 34 00:01:34,390 --> 00:01:36,650 And you might call that the new normal, where 35 00:01:36,650 --> 00:01:38,320 we're going about our business, the room 36 00:01:38,320 --> 00:01:40,030 is filled with the typical number of people. 37 00:01:40,030 --> 00:01:42,100 Let's say, the classroom is back to its normal size. 38 00:01:42,100 --> 00:01:43,900 We don't have any remote teaching going on. 39 00:01:43,900 --> 00:01:48,380 But we're wearing masks or taking other factors 40 00:01:48,380 --> 00:01:50,800 into account, such as higher ventilation rates, let's say, 41 00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:52,300 open windows. 42 00:01:52,300 --> 00:01:54,710 But then we continue lowering the prevalence. 43 00:01:54,710 --> 00:01:56,380 There's a certain point where we get rid 44 00:01:56,380 --> 00:01:57,670 of those other precautions. 45 00:01:57,670 --> 00:01:59,360 So extra open your windows. 46 00:01:59,360 --> 00:02:01,030 Or more importantly, the dominant effect 47 00:02:01,030 --> 00:02:03,100 is the removal of the mask because we know 48 00:02:03,100 --> 00:02:04,780 that's a significant factor. 49 00:02:04,780 --> 00:02:07,210 And then you might call that back to the real normal, 50 00:02:07,210 --> 00:02:08,750 actually, not the new normal. 51 00:02:08,750 --> 00:02:11,890 Where we are back to full occupancy and really not 52 00:02:11,890 --> 00:02:13,160 taking any precautions. 53 00:02:13,160 --> 00:02:15,250 That's going to happen at a rather low prevalence. 54 00:02:15,250 --> 00:02:17,350 But we hope that that time will eventually come 55 00:02:17,350 --> 00:02:19,120 and hopefully not so far in the future. 56 00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:20,829 And I mention here a very important point 57 00:02:20,829 --> 00:02:23,110 we've not talked about yet in this class 58 00:02:23,110 --> 00:02:25,870 but we should keep in the back of our minds. 59 00:02:25,870 --> 00:02:27,810 When I talk about occupancy I'm really 60 00:02:27,810 --> 00:02:29,770 talking about the number of susceptible people. 61 00:02:29,770 --> 00:02:31,810 We just saw that in the last couple of boards. 62 00:02:31,810 --> 00:02:33,850 But the number of susceptible people 63 00:02:33,850 --> 00:02:38,050 are really only those that are not immune to the disease, 64 00:02:38,050 --> 00:02:40,480 for example, by vaccination. 65 00:02:40,480 --> 00:02:44,110 So as more and more people become vaccinated, 66 00:02:44,110 --> 00:02:46,190 then this occupancy number might-- for example, 67 00:02:46,190 --> 00:02:47,570 let's say, as a typical occupancy 68 00:02:47,570 --> 00:02:49,930 will be at 25 people in a class. 69 00:02:49,930 --> 00:02:51,970 As more and more people are vaccinated, 70 00:02:51,970 --> 00:02:53,650 the number that we plug in this formula 71 00:02:53,650 --> 00:02:57,740 here might actually be lower when we just make decisions 72 00:02:57,740 --> 00:02:59,620 because there are fewer and fewer susceptible 73 00:02:59,620 --> 00:03:00,490 people that are left. 74 00:03:00,490 --> 00:03:03,110 So that's another very important factor to keep in mind. 75 00:03:03,110 --> 00:03:05,770 Of course, also, vaccination has the indirect effect 76 00:03:05,770 --> 00:03:08,440 of lowering the prevalence that is seen in the population 77 00:03:08,440 --> 00:03:10,120 as we start to stamp out the epidemics. 78 00:03:10,120 --> 00:03:11,710 So we also have that effect. 79 00:03:11,710 --> 00:03:14,080 So I won't talk about that any further now 80 00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:17,410 but come back to this calculation based on the risk 81 00:03:17,410 --> 00:03:19,960 scenario, the second one that I talked about last time, where 82 00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:22,450 we take into account prevalence 83 00:03:22,450 --> 00:03:24,530 So let's look at the three different cases here. 84 00:03:24,530 --> 00:03:27,850 So the first one is where we have restricted occupancy. 85 00:03:34,920 --> 00:03:36,870 This is where we've decided there's 86 00:03:36,870 --> 00:03:42,180 an N1, which is epsilon over average beta tau. 87 00:03:42,180 --> 00:03:45,000 So all the physical parameters are buried in there. 88 00:03:45,000 --> 00:03:46,380 And this is going to be something 89 00:03:46,380 --> 00:03:49,500 less than the normal occupancy, N0. 90 00:03:49,500 --> 00:03:51,430 Now what is the tau we want to think about? 91 00:03:51,430 --> 00:03:53,250 Well, if we have a school or a business, 92 00:03:53,250 --> 00:03:54,780 this would be the cumulative time 93 00:03:54,780 --> 00:03:57,060 that people spend together to the point 94 00:03:57,060 --> 00:03:59,520 where the number of days they spend together is, let's say, 95 00:03:59,520 --> 00:04:02,100 on the order of a week would be a reasonable number 96 00:04:02,100 --> 00:04:03,900 to think about. 97 00:04:03,900 --> 00:04:10,670 Because if we write tau is the typical hours per day. 98 00:04:10,670 --> 00:04:14,810 Time is some kind of maximum number of days. 99 00:04:14,810 --> 00:04:17,420 This maximum number of days could 100 00:04:17,420 --> 00:04:20,350 be set by, for example, the testing frequency. 101 00:04:23,650 --> 00:04:28,080 For example, here at MIT, we are testing our entire population 102 00:04:28,080 --> 00:04:30,520 at least once a week in order for anyone, 103 00:04:30,520 --> 00:04:33,260 including myself, to be admitted to the campus. 104 00:04:33,260 --> 00:04:35,260 And so we are definitely testing within a week 105 00:04:35,260 --> 00:04:37,900 and catching new infections at that rate. 106 00:04:37,900 --> 00:04:42,100 It could also be motivated by the incubation time, which 107 00:04:42,100 --> 00:04:43,330 is the time to show symptoms. 108 00:04:43,330 --> 00:04:45,800 And most people will remove themselves. 109 00:04:45,800 --> 00:04:49,650 And we know that's around 5.5 days, a typically reported 110 00:04:49,650 --> 00:04:50,150 value. 111 00:04:50,150 --> 00:04:52,280 So again, on the order of a week. 112 00:04:52,280 --> 00:04:54,520 And there's also, of course, other ways 113 00:04:54,520 --> 00:04:58,180 that people are removed or they recover. 114 00:04:58,180 --> 00:05:00,310 So there's removal and recovery, which 115 00:05:00,310 --> 00:05:03,030 is another way that if you start to go more than, 116 00:05:03,030 --> 00:05:04,660 let's say, two weeks, we start to think 117 00:05:04,660 --> 00:05:06,190 an infected person that didn't get 118 00:05:06,190 --> 00:05:08,190 removed then end up in the hospital has probably 119 00:05:08,190 --> 00:05:08,950 recovered. 120 00:05:08,950 --> 00:05:12,040 So if we think of a certain number of days and hours 121 00:05:12,040 --> 00:05:13,900 per day, that gives a tau that is 122 00:05:13,900 --> 00:05:15,560 going to go into this formula. 123 00:05:15,560 --> 00:05:17,860 And actually, I should also mention that for simplicity 124 00:05:17,860 --> 00:05:23,080 here, technically this should be N1 minus 1. 125 00:05:23,080 --> 00:05:25,750 And I can either include that or not when I do this calculation. 126 00:05:25,750 --> 00:05:29,230 But I'm generally thinking of N1, which 127 00:05:29,230 --> 00:05:30,790 is going to be bigger than 1. 128 00:05:30,790 --> 00:05:32,860 So think of an occupancy of 10 people 129 00:05:32,860 --> 00:05:35,260 in a classroom, or something, might be a limit 130 00:05:35,260 --> 00:05:37,659 that we would be interested in considering. 131 00:05:37,659 --> 00:05:40,930 But certainly we can put the 1 in there if we want to. 132 00:05:40,930 --> 00:05:43,600 So now let's ask ourselves, how would we 133 00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:45,730 start to reopen the space once we've 134 00:05:45,730 --> 00:05:50,680 decided on a safe occupancy during the greatest 135 00:05:50,680 --> 00:05:53,430 level of restrictions? 136 00:05:53,430 --> 00:05:55,230 So that would then lead us into a phase 137 00:05:55,230 --> 00:05:56,540 of relaxing restrictions. 138 00:06:02,590 --> 00:06:05,800 And this would still be with masks. 139 00:06:08,840 --> 00:06:11,750 So keeping in mind that masks are an essential part 140 00:06:11,750 --> 00:06:14,750 of achieving a reasonable occupancy when 141 00:06:14,750 --> 00:06:17,850 the pandemic is high and there's a lot of prevalence. 142 00:06:17,850 --> 00:06:21,380 And that we would only start to relax occupancy first 143 00:06:21,380 --> 00:06:24,590 before we take away the suggestion to wear masks. 144 00:06:24,590 --> 00:06:26,570 And that would be then the last step. 145 00:06:26,570 --> 00:06:29,300 So for relaxing restrictions, we're 146 00:06:29,300 --> 00:06:32,540 then going to be interested in the indoor reproductive number 147 00:06:32,540 --> 00:06:35,540 being less than now a rescaled value, which 148 00:06:35,540 --> 00:06:41,960 would be epsilon over P i Q i N. And the indoor reproductive 149 00:06:41,960 --> 00:06:43,700 number, remember, is N minus 1. 150 00:06:43,700 --> 00:06:49,050 But it's approximately N times beta tau. 151 00:06:49,050 --> 00:06:52,130 So I've replaced again N minus 1 with N 152 00:06:52,130 --> 00:06:54,930 just to get a simpler formula. 153 00:06:54,930 --> 00:06:57,690 And so notice now here, N is in both sides of the equation. 154 00:06:57,690 --> 00:07:00,590 If I want to solve for the value N2, which 155 00:07:00,590 --> 00:07:03,170 is this yellow curve here, I'm actually 156 00:07:03,170 --> 00:07:05,780 going to have to put the N's on one side 157 00:07:05,780 --> 00:07:08,130 and take a square root. 158 00:07:08,130 --> 00:07:15,050 So my N2 then would be the square root 159 00:07:15,050 --> 00:07:23,120 of epsilon over beta tau times P i times Q i. 160 00:07:23,120 --> 00:07:24,980 And remember also, another approximation 161 00:07:24,980 --> 00:07:27,590 here is that P i is definitely much less than 1. 162 00:07:27,590 --> 00:07:29,880 We're looking to limit a very low prevalence. 163 00:07:29,880 --> 00:07:33,530 And so also therefore, Q i is basically tending to 1 164 00:07:33,530 --> 00:07:35,330 because it's 1 minus P i. 165 00:07:35,330 --> 00:07:37,580 And so that factor is really not that important. 166 00:07:37,580 --> 00:07:41,659 And notice also, epsilon over beta tau, that's N1. 167 00:07:41,659 --> 00:07:47,780 So N3 is approximately related to N1 by the square root of N1 168 00:07:47,780 --> 00:07:49,610 divided by P i. 169 00:07:55,450 --> 00:07:56,770 That's this number here. 170 00:07:56,770 --> 00:07:59,140 So the function prevalence, this yellow curve, 171 00:07:59,140 --> 00:08:02,880 is 1 over square root of prevalence. 172 00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:05,780 And one nice thing about writing it this way 173 00:08:05,780 --> 00:08:08,780 is that I can decide on a reopening protocol 174 00:08:08,780 --> 00:08:10,940 without actually redoing my calculation 175 00:08:10,940 --> 00:08:13,280 with all those complicated variables, including the risk 176 00:08:13,280 --> 00:08:15,290 tolerance epsilon, and all the factors that 177 00:08:15,290 --> 00:08:17,330 go into beta because I've lumped them into N1. 178 00:08:17,330 --> 00:08:19,760 What I'm saying here is that we've already 179 00:08:19,760 --> 00:08:23,060 done a calculation and decided to impose a certain occupancy 180 00:08:23,060 --> 00:08:25,340 restriction on certain space based on principles 181 00:08:25,340 --> 00:08:28,220 that we've been discussing in this course. 182 00:08:28,220 --> 00:08:30,220 But now as prevalence goes down, according 183 00:08:30,220 --> 00:08:33,799 to the simple formula, whenever N2 is bigger than 1-- 184 00:08:33,799 --> 00:08:37,070 we would use this if N2 is bigger than N1. 185 00:08:37,070 --> 00:08:39,260 So basically, when these two curves cross, 186 00:08:39,260 --> 00:08:41,900 as you get a lower prevalence, you now switch to two 187 00:08:41,900 --> 00:08:43,940 and you'll start increasing. 188 00:08:43,940 --> 00:08:48,580 And you will do that until you get to N0. 189 00:08:48,580 --> 00:08:50,410 This is the relaxing restrictions. 190 00:08:54,150 --> 00:09:01,880 So basically, when N2 is bigger, than we allow this until N2 191 00:09:01,880 --> 00:09:03,500 equals N1. 192 00:09:03,500 --> 00:09:06,650 And that's this time here, P, P2. 193 00:09:06,650 --> 00:09:10,380 So basically, we start imposing restrictions at P1. 194 00:09:13,460 --> 00:09:17,360 So basically, we start relaxing restrictions 195 00:09:17,360 --> 00:09:20,180 when the prevalence equals P1. 196 00:09:20,180 --> 00:09:26,700 That would be when N2 is equal to N1. 197 00:09:26,700 --> 00:09:35,020 And so that would be when P1 is 1 over N1. 198 00:09:35,020 --> 00:09:36,880 So essentially, that's when you expect 199 00:09:36,880 --> 00:09:39,560 to find one infected person. 200 00:09:39,560 --> 00:09:44,350 So this is approximately 1 over N1. 201 00:09:44,350 --> 00:09:47,590 Up here, when you go below this, you're saying, 202 00:09:47,590 --> 00:09:49,930 well, it's actually unlikely that during the time tau 203 00:09:49,930 --> 00:09:51,650 we'll even get one infected person. 204 00:09:51,650 --> 00:09:54,550 And that's when we start to relax. 205 00:09:54,550 --> 00:09:57,910 So that's the first crossover point. 206 00:09:57,910 --> 00:09:59,410 And there's a second crossover point 207 00:09:59,410 --> 00:10:03,130 when this is equal to P2-- 208 00:10:03,130 --> 00:10:04,480 sorry, is equal to N0. 209 00:10:04,480 --> 00:10:06,070 That's [INAUDIBLE] P2 is. 210 00:10:06,070 --> 00:10:09,130 And so basically, P2, which is when 211 00:10:09,130 --> 00:10:11,560 we would hit the saturation point and that's 212 00:10:11,560 --> 00:10:13,720 when we've reopened in some sense 213 00:10:13,720 --> 00:10:17,410 to the full normal situation, that would 214 00:10:17,410 --> 00:10:21,930 be when N2 is equal to N0. 215 00:10:21,930 --> 00:10:22,430 Wait, sorry. 216 00:10:22,430 --> 00:10:24,390 I wrote here N2 equals N1. 217 00:10:24,390 --> 00:10:26,210 Sorry, I meant when N2 equals N0. 218 00:10:26,210 --> 00:10:27,590 Sorry. 219 00:10:27,590 --> 00:10:30,140 That's the time P2 here, when N2 is equal to N0, 220 00:10:30,140 --> 00:10:31,340 that's when we cut off. 221 00:10:31,340 --> 00:10:33,140 So this is N0. 222 00:10:33,140 --> 00:10:34,910 And we solve for P i. 223 00:10:34,910 --> 00:10:40,440 You can see that we get N1 over N0 squared. 224 00:10:43,330 --> 00:10:45,510 So that is the place where I then switch. 225 00:10:45,510 --> 00:10:49,140 And now I'm going to cap the occupancy at N0. 226 00:10:49,140 --> 00:10:52,680 So maybe to summarize here, what I would say 227 00:10:52,680 --> 00:10:57,570 is that the occupancy should be less 228 00:10:57,570 --> 00:11:05,940 than or equal to N1 for P i greater than P1. 229 00:11:05,940 --> 00:11:16,500 It'll be N2, which depends on P i for P i between P1 230 00:11:16,500 --> 00:11:20,580 or P2 and P1. 231 00:11:20,580 --> 00:11:22,170 And then as the prevalence gets lower, 232 00:11:22,170 --> 00:11:29,180 we go to full occupancy, N0, when P i is less than P2. 233 00:11:29,180 --> 00:11:34,010 So this is basically this full curve of reopening. 234 00:11:34,010 --> 00:11:36,350 And then the final decision to make 235 00:11:36,350 --> 00:11:38,310 is, when do we return completely to normal 236 00:11:38,310 --> 00:11:40,230 and take away certain restrictions we've done? 237 00:11:40,230 --> 00:11:41,730 So here I mentioned masks. 238 00:11:41,730 --> 00:11:44,660 We could also include in this calculation relaxing 239 00:11:44,660 --> 00:11:47,000 other restrictions, such as maybe not having 240 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:49,160 the ventilation on quite so high. 241 00:11:49,160 --> 00:11:51,740 So that would be when we finally go back 242 00:11:51,740 --> 00:11:54,350 to no restrictions of any kind. 243 00:11:54,350 --> 00:11:57,030 We're back to normal. 244 00:11:57,030 --> 00:12:03,800 So this means no masks, no other precautions, full occupancy. 245 00:12:03,800 --> 00:12:10,880 So in this case, R N is going to be less than epsilon over-- 246 00:12:14,030 --> 00:12:14,910 well, let's see here. 247 00:12:14,910 --> 00:12:16,330 It's the same as before. 248 00:12:16,330 --> 00:12:20,670 We have this P i, N that we just looked at. 249 00:12:20,670 --> 00:12:22,920 Or technically. times Q i. 250 00:12:22,920 --> 00:12:26,730 But now we have another factor, P M squared. 251 00:12:26,730 --> 00:12:28,720 Because compared to the case with no masks, 252 00:12:28,720 --> 00:12:30,220 we know the bound in the guidelines. 253 00:12:30,220 --> 00:12:34,750 So the effect of beta just gets rescaled by P M squared. 254 00:12:34,750 --> 00:12:38,490 So technically that's in R N here. 255 00:12:38,490 --> 00:12:40,470 But now we have this extra factor. 256 00:12:40,470 --> 00:12:43,770 You think of it like a rescaling of epsilon. 257 00:12:43,770 --> 00:12:46,710 And so what that's going to do for us then 258 00:12:46,710 --> 00:12:57,980 is that there's another curve that goes like this, which 259 00:12:57,980 --> 00:13:02,000 is just like this one but it's shifted by a factor P M cubed-- 260 00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:03,110 or P M squared, sorry. 261 00:13:03,110 --> 00:13:09,790 Which is like the case where you had-- so this is like no masks. 262 00:13:09,790 --> 00:13:11,710 It's like the N2 with no masks. 263 00:13:11,710 --> 00:13:17,600 And the other curve is with masks. 264 00:13:17,600 --> 00:13:19,160 And there's a rescaling factor, which 265 00:13:19,160 --> 00:13:22,650 really has to do with the remediation that you've done. 266 00:13:22,650 --> 00:13:30,110 And in this case, P3 would then just be P M squared times P2. 267 00:13:30,110 --> 00:13:32,480 So if our P M is a factor of 10%, 268 00:13:32,480 --> 00:13:37,100 let's say, masks are letting 10% of infectious droplets 269 00:13:37,100 --> 00:13:39,740 get through, the P M squared might be a factor of 100. 270 00:13:39,740 --> 00:13:41,510 So then we would wait to the prevalence 271 00:13:41,510 --> 00:13:45,290 is 100 times smaller before we finally allow people to remove 272 00:13:45,290 --> 00:13:47,510 masks and be at full occupancy. 273 00:13:47,510 --> 00:13:49,370 And you could make a similar calculation 274 00:13:49,370 --> 00:13:51,460 for other types of restrictions. 275 00:13:51,460 --> 00:13:54,590 And in fact, you can calculate such a curve 276 00:13:54,590 --> 00:13:59,000 for a given room, given scenario of human behavior 277 00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:03,590 and interventions, such as filtration or ventilation. 278 00:14:03,590 --> 00:14:06,290 And what the theory allows you to do is to, of course, 279 00:14:06,290 --> 00:14:07,790 recalculate N1. 280 00:14:07,790 --> 00:14:10,950 And then you can recalculate N2 as well. 281 00:14:10,950 --> 00:14:13,550 And so you can say, well, I don't like this curve. 282 00:14:13,550 --> 00:14:16,610 I would like to try to reopen my school sooner. 283 00:14:16,610 --> 00:14:18,210 How would I do that? 284 00:14:18,210 --> 00:14:21,650 Well, I know that if I make various interventions, 285 00:14:21,650 --> 00:14:23,060 I can raise the pink curve. 286 00:14:23,060 --> 00:14:26,120 So I could end up somewhere here, let's just say. 287 00:14:26,120 --> 00:14:32,190 This might be with safety interventions. 288 00:14:35,660 --> 00:14:37,860 Actually, one such intervention, by the way, 289 00:14:37,860 --> 00:14:38,870 is masks themselves. 290 00:14:38,870 --> 00:14:40,670 Because if I follow this curve all the way down here, 291 00:14:40,670 --> 00:14:42,120 there's some curve down here, which 292 00:14:42,120 --> 00:14:45,780 is no masks, which is the safety guideline with no masks. 293 00:14:45,780 --> 00:14:48,720 And if I turn on masks, I go up. 294 00:14:48,720 --> 00:14:52,020 But when I make that intervention, also P2, notice, 295 00:14:52,020 --> 00:14:55,200 scales also like N1. 296 00:14:55,200 --> 00:14:57,550 And so that's actually moving in this direction. 297 00:14:57,550 --> 00:15:00,160 And so I essentially move this yellow curve. 298 00:15:00,160 --> 00:15:02,880 And so I'm now going to say, well, 299 00:15:02,880 --> 00:15:07,020 with a different set of interventions 300 00:15:07,020 --> 00:15:08,920 I can make the room safer. 301 00:15:08,920 --> 00:15:11,920 And what that does, it gives me more people in the room. 302 00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:15,220 But it also means that I change when 303 00:15:15,220 --> 00:15:16,470 I make the decision to reopen. 304 00:15:16,470 --> 00:15:18,210 And in particular, I can get myself 305 00:15:18,210 --> 00:15:21,030 to full occupancy at a higher prevalence 306 00:15:21,030 --> 00:15:24,200 because the room is actually now made safer. 307 00:15:24,200 --> 00:15:26,760 So I note it. 308 00:15:26,760 --> 00:15:29,630 But on the other hand, this switch here was at 1 over N1. 309 00:15:29,630 --> 00:15:31,910 So this part shrinks a little bit 310 00:15:31,910 --> 00:15:35,520 as this ultimately goes up to full occupancy. 311 00:15:35,520 --> 00:15:40,520 So basically, I think compared to the current situation 312 00:15:40,520 --> 00:15:43,520 or the typical situation where policymakers are making 313 00:15:43,520 --> 00:15:46,640 decisions based on something like the six-foot rule 314 00:15:46,640 --> 00:15:49,910 and a somewhat arbitrary feeling about what is a high 315 00:15:49,910 --> 00:15:52,760 prevalence-- is it 1%, is 0.1%-- 316 00:15:52,760 --> 00:15:55,460 and we decide, OK, now we can close our schools 317 00:15:55,460 --> 00:15:58,610 or reopen our schools or set the occupancy at half, 318 00:15:58,610 --> 00:16:01,220 the guideline tells you how to set occupancy 319 00:16:01,220 --> 00:16:06,530 for of the worst case scenario, when the pandemic is 320 00:16:06,530 --> 00:16:09,200 very prevalent in society. 321 00:16:09,200 --> 00:16:11,420 But now also, through these kinds of calculations, 322 00:16:11,420 --> 00:16:14,240 we can make rational decisions about how to reopen. 323 00:16:14,240 --> 00:16:17,050 I'm not advocating necessarily for the exact formulas 324 00:16:17,050 --> 00:16:18,310 we find on the board here. 325 00:16:18,310 --> 00:16:19,730 But the principles I'm showing you 326 00:16:19,730 --> 00:16:23,630 could lead to quantitative and scientifically justifiable 327 00:16:23,630 --> 00:16:27,650 ways of taking a specific space and a specific usage 328 00:16:27,650 --> 00:16:30,680 of that space and deciding how to close, as prevalence goes 329 00:16:30,680 --> 00:16:33,320 up, and reopen, as prevalence goes down, 330 00:16:33,320 --> 00:16:35,510 including ultimately returning to normal 331 00:16:35,510 --> 00:16:39,110 and removing masks and all other forms of precaution 332 00:16:39,110 --> 00:16:42,400 as the epidemic disappears.