1 00:00:00,070 --> 00:00:01,770 The following content is provided 2 00:00:01,770 --> 00:00:04,010 under a Creative Commons license. 3 00:00:04,010 --> 00:00:06,860 Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare continue 4 00:00:06,860 --> 00:00:10,720 to offer high quality educational resources for free. 5 00:00:10,720 --> 00:00:13,330 To make a donation or view additional materials 6 00:00:13,330 --> 00:00:17,202 from hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare 7 00:00:17,202 --> 00:00:17,827 at ocw.mit.edu. 8 00:00:21,300 --> 00:00:24,430 PROFESSOR: Good afternoon. 9 00:00:24,430 --> 00:00:26,310 Let's get started. 10 00:00:28,920 --> 00:00:32,189 So we continue our discussion today 11 00:00:32,189 --> 00:00:35,320 about light atom interaction. 12 00:00:35,320 --> 00:00:38,952 And just to sort of remind you where we are, 13 00:00:38,952 --> 00:00:43,410 we started last week, even before spring 14 00:00:43,410 --> 00:00:47,620 break, to talk about the matrix element which 15 00:00:47,620 --> 00:00:49,410 provides a coupling. 16 00:00:49,410 --> 00:00:52,090 So now we have a coupling between the two states. 17 00:00:52,090 --> 00:00:54,150 And we want to understand what is 18 00:00:54,150 --> 00:00:56,990 the coupling doing to the system. 19 00:00:56,990 --> 00:00:59,310 What is a dynamical evolution of the system? 20 00:00:59,310 --> 00:01:01,100 How does the atomic wave function 21 00:01:01,100 --> 00:01:09,020 evolve when we couple two states using optical fields? 22 00:01:09,020 --> 00:01:15,230 And well, as usual, we start with the basic phenomena. 23 00:01:15,230 --> 00:01:17,720 And this is we do perturbation theory 24 00:01:17,720 --> 00:01:20,500 with a dipole Hamiltonian. 25 00:01:20,500 --> 00:01:25,170 And we have done that on Monday. 26 00:01:25,170 --> 00:01:27,190 We've done perturbation theory. 27 00:01:27,190 --> 00:01:29,830 And I made an important distinction 28 00:01:29,830 --> 00:01:34,570 between a monochromatic case and [INAUDIBLE] case. 29 00:01:34,570 --> 00:01:38,190 The monochromatic case gave us in perturbation theory 30 00:01:38,190 --> 00:01:39,640 this result. 31 00:01:39,640 --> 00:01:41,450 And if you stare at it for a while, 32 00:01:41,450 --> 00:01:43,940 you see, well, these are just Rabi oscillations. 33 00:01:43,940 --> 00:01:46,720 It's not the formula of Rabi oscillations 34 00:01:46,720 --> 00:01:48,670 with the generalized Rabi frequency 35 00:01:48,670 --> 00:01:51,650 and power broadening because it's perturbation theory. 36 00:01:51,650 --> 00:01:55,160 So these are Rabi oscillations in the perturbative limit. 37 00:01:55,160 --> 00:01:59,690 But also on Monday I showed you that for interactions 38 00:01:59,690 --> 00:02:03,920 with monochromatic light, we can just rewrite the Hamiltonian. 39 00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:06,800 That it not just looks like, it is exactly 40 00:02:06,800 --> 00:02:12,670 the Hamiltonian for spin 1/2 in a magnetic field. 41 00:02:12,670 --> 00:02:15,090 And we have already discussed the solution. 42 00:02:15,090 --> 00:02:17,611 So, therefore, we know for monochromatic radiation, 43 00:02:17,611 --> 00:02:19,360 we can just go beyond perturbation theory. 44 00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:21,380 We can solve it exactly. 45 00:02:21,380 --> 00:02:21,970 OK. 46 00:02:21,970 --> 00:02:24,675 So monochromatic radiation we understand. 47 00:02:24,675 --> 00:02:29,910 At least as long as we have just the coupling of the atom 48 00:02:29,910 --> 00:02:33,270 to a single mode of the electromagnetic field. 49 00:02:33,270 --> 00:02:36,174 And now we come back to the broadband case. 50 00:02:36,174 --> 00:02:38,340 I give a little bit more of a summary and an outline 51 00:02:38,340 --> 00:02:40,690 after I finish the broadband case. 52 00:02:40,690 --> 00:02:45,770 So what we have right now is we have Rabi oscillations, 53 00:02:45,770 --> 00:02:48,310 which we derived for a single mode. 54 00:02:48,310 --> 00:02:52,670 And the broadband case is such that we now 55 00:02:52,670 --> 00:02:59,940 assume that we have a spectrum of frequencies. 56 00:02:59,940 --> 00:03:03,620 And we assume that to be flat and broad in a moment. 57 00:03:03,620 --> 00:03:06,580 And what we have to do now is we have 58 00:03:06,580 --> 00:03:09,470 to substitute in this formula the Rabi 59 00:03:09,470 --> 00:03:12,100 frequency by the electric field. 60 00:03:12,100 --> 00:03:15,200 And the electric field becomes using the connection 61 00:03:15,200 --> 00:03:23,070 between electric field and energy density, 62 00:03:23,070 --> 00:03:25,280 eventually the Rabi frequency squared 63 00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:30,150 gets replaced by an integral over the spectral density. 64 00:03:30,150 --> 00:03:31,800 It looks mathematically exact. 65 00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:33,650 But, of course, you all recognize 66 00:03:33,650 --> 00:03:37,170 that I've made a very important assumption here. 67 00:03:37,170 --> 00:03:39,630 Namely, that there is no correlation whatsoever 68 00:03:39,630 --> 00:03:41,550 between the different frequencies. 69 00:03:41,550 --> 00:03:45,400 Because by integrating here, I'm just 70 00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:47,410 summing up the e squares assuming 71 00:03:47,410 --> 00:03:50,034 that there's no interference, no coherence, no correlation 72 00:03:50,034 --> 00:03:51,450 between the different frequencies. 73 00:03:54,390 --> 00:03:59,840 OK, so with those assumptions I can now just 74 00:03:59,840 --> 00:04:01,970 formulate the mathematics exactly. 75 00:04:01,970 --> 00:04:06,080 I calculate now the probability to be in the excited state 76 00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:10,550 by assuming we have this kind of pertrubative Rabi oscillations 77 00:04:10,550 --> 00:04:12,500 at every frequency component. 78 00:04:12,500 --> 00:04:16,209 But we integrate over all frequencies. 79 00:04:16,209 --> 00:04:17,790 Any questions? 80 00:04:17,790 --> 00:04:24,465 So now-- and this is where I ended the last lecture. 81 00:04:27,730 --> 00:04:31,257 And there are actually now, this is really an interesting case. 82 00:04:31,257 --> 00:04:32,840 I know I sometimes spend a lot of time 83 00:04:32,840 --> 00:04:35,230 on sort of where the math is simple, 84 00:04:35,230 --> 00:04:37,280 but the physics is really interesting. 85 00:04:37,280 --> 00:04:41,440 So the probability to find an atom in the excited state 86 00:04:41,440 --> 00:04:45,510 is now this function which replaces, 87 00:04:45,510 --> 00:04:47,610 which are the Rabit oscillations, 88 00:04:47,610 --> 00:04:51,290 convoluted integrated over the spectral density. 89 00:04:51,290 --> 00:04:53,005 And now we have to consider two cases. 90 00:04:56,490 --> 00:04:59,870 If this function is flat and is spectrally very broad, 91 00:04:59,870 --> 00:05:03,030 we can pull it out of the integral 92 00:05:03,030 --> 00:05:07,040 However, this function here, which are your Rabi 93 00:05:07,040 --> 00:05:10,240 oscillations-- sine squared of an [? augument ?] divided 94 00:05:10,240 --> 00:05:13,630 by the [? augument. ?] I've plotted it here for you. 95 00:05:13,630 --> 00:05:16,900 This function is actually very peculiar. 96 00:05:16,900 --> 00:05:20,660 It has a height of t square. 97 00:05:20,660 --> 00:05:23,280 If you're doing Taylor Expansion for short times t. 98 00:05:23,280 --> 00:05:26,380 But the width is t to the minus 1. 99 00:05:26,380 --> 00:05:29,570 So as time goes by, it gets narrower, and taller, 100 00:05:29,570 --> 00:05:30,910 and taller. 101 00:05:30,910 --> 00:05:34,510 And if you take t squared by t to the minus 1, you get t. 102 00:05:34,510 --> 00:05:38,530 So the integral over it is just t. 103 00:05:38,530 --> 00:05:43,780 So in other words, we have a function 104 00:05:43,780 --> 00:05:47,350 which goes as t square. 105 00:05:47,350 --> 00:05:49,430 But the integral is t. 106 00:05:49,430 --> 00:05:52,280 And if the width is so narrow that the width doesn't really 107 00:05:52,280 --> 00:05:56,430 matter, we can say this function has become a delta function. 108 00:05:56,430 --> 00:05:58,900 But the integral over the function is t. 109 00:05:58,900 --> 00:06:01,530 So it becomes t times the delta function. 110 00:06:01,530 --> 00:06:03,400 And now we the two limiting cases. 111 00:06:07,960 --> 00:06:14,250 If very short times t-- this Rabi oscillation function 112 00:06:14,250 --> 00:06:16,420 is extremely broad. 113 00:06:16,420 --> 00:06:19,250 And at infinitesimal times t, it is 114 00:06:19,250 --> 00:06:22,120 broader than any spectral bandwidths. 115 00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:23,870 So actually what we are doing is when 116 00:06:23,870 --> 00:06:27,780 we solve this integral at very short time, this is broader. 117 00:06:27,780 --> 00:06:30,000 And we pull this out of the integral. 118 00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:32,940 And this gives us a prefect of t squared. 119 00:06:32,940 --> 00:06:35,053 So, therefore, the excitation probability 120 00:06:35,053 --> 00:06:38,995 is t squared times the integral of the spectral function which 121 00:06:38,995 --> 00:06:40,245 is just the totally intensity. 122 00:06:42,750 --> 00:06:46,810 However, if you wait a little time, 123 00:06:46,810 --> 00:06:49,050 and eventually if the time is such 124 00:06:49,050 --> 00:06:53,530 that the time is longer than the inverse bandwidths 125 00:06:53,530 --> 00:06:58,290 of the spectral radiation, then the spectral radiation 126 00:06:58,290 --> 00:07:01,470 is broader than this function, f. 127 00:07:01,470 --> 00:07:04,150 And we pull this out of the integral. 128 00:07:04,150 --> 00:07:07,270 And then what we have is we have simply the integral here 129 00:07:07,270 --> 00:07:11,250 over the delta function which gives us a factor of t. 130 00:07:11,250 --> 00:07:12,770 So we have two functions. 131 00:07:12,770 --> 00:07:15,910 And whichever is broader can be pulled out of the integral. 132 00:07:15,910 --> 00:07:18,010 And that means in one case, we have a probability 133 00:07:18,010 --> 00:07:21,090 which is t squared times the total intensity. 134 00:07:21,090 --> 00:07:23,310 And in the other case, we have a behavior 135 00:07:23,310 --> 00:07:27,270 which is the time times the spectral density at 0 detuning. 136 00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:34,360 OK. 137 00:07:34,360 --> 00:07:38,180 So now let's-- just a side remark before I interpret this 138 00:07:38,180 --> 00:07:42,590 result, this function you would recover actually the Rabi 139 00:07:42,590 --> 00:07:43,330 oscillation. 140 00:07:43,330 --> 00:07:45,050 I plotted it in that way emphasizing 141 00:07:45,050 --> 00:07:46,680 the amplitude and the width. 142 00:07:46,680 --> 00:07:51,150 But if you look for fixed detuning and you vary the time, 143 00:07:51,150 --> 00:07:53,390 this function is sort of spreading out 144 00:07:53,390 --> 00:07:56,580 and at a fixed detuning, you'll go up and down. 145 00:07:56,580 --> 00:07:58,100 And these are the Rabi oscillations 146 00:07:58,100 --> 00:08:02,720 we have discussed for monochromatic radiation before. 147 00:08:02,720 --> 00:08:06,070 So these two limiting cases are actually very important. 148 00:08:06,070 --> 00:08:09,830 At very short times, the behavior is, you know, 149 00:08:09,830 --> 00:08:12,210 we have broad spectral radiation. 150 00:08:12,210 --> 00:08:14,600 But if the time is shorter than the inverse bandwidth 151 00:08:14,600 --> 00:08:17,630 of the radiation, even the broadband radiation 152 00:08:17,630 --> 00:08:20,070 is like monochromatic wave. 153 00:08:20,070 --> 00:08:24,680 And the short time behavior is t squared times the intensity. 154 00:08:24,680 --> 00:08:27,670 That's exactly what we got for monochromatic light. 155 00:08:27,670 --> 00:08:30,256 In other words, if you're broadening, 156 00:08:30,256 --> 00:08:31,630 you have a broad spectral source, 157 00:08:31,630 --> 00:08:33,980 but if your inverse time is broader 158 00:08:33,980 --> 00:08:36,020 than the broadening of the spectral source, 159 00:08:36,020 --> 00:08:38,409 you're back to the monochromatic case. 160 00:08:38,409 --> 00:08:40,030 So a lot of people get confused. 161 00:08:40,030 --> 00:08:43,370 I mean, I see that often in part 3 oral exams, that 162 00:08:43,370 --> 00:08:45,080 no matter what your spectral bandwidth 163 00:08:45,080 --> 00:08:47,050 is-- unless it's infinite. 164 00:08:47,050 --> 00:08:49,140 But let's discuss a pathological case. 165 00:08:49,140 --> 00:08:52,530 For any broadband light, at short moments, 166 00:08:52,530 --> 00:08:55,080 the system evolves as t square. 167 00:08:55,080 --> 00:08:59,050 And t square is the hallmark of coherent time evolution. 168 00:08:59,050 --> 00:09:00,890 The amplitude goes with t. 169 00:09:00,890 --> 00:09:03,350 The probability goes with t square. 170 00:09:03,350 --> 00:09:07,400 And only when the bandwidth of the spectral light 171 00:09:07,400 --> 00:09:11,200 dominates when we can replace this by the delta function. 172 00:09:11,200 --> 00:09:13,390 Then we are in the regime, which you all 173 00:09:13,390 --> 00:09:18,350 know is Fermi's Golden Rule, where we [INAUDIBLE] equation. 174 00:09:18,350 --> 00:09:20,540 And it all comes from this formula. 175 00:09:20,540 --> 00:09:23,540 It all comes from assuming Rabi oscillations. 176 00:09:23,540 --> 00:09:26,820 But then performing the spectral integral 177 00:09:26,820 --> 00:09:28,380 over the Rabi oscillation. 178 00:09:28,380 --> 00:09:30,960 This takes us from the narrowband case 179 00:09:30,960 --> 00:09:33,471 to the broadband case. 180 00:09:33,471 --> 00:09:34,800 Any questions about that? 181 00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:35,300 Yes? 182 00:09:35,300 --> 00:09:37,920 AUDIENCE: So what says the bandwidth here? 183 00:09:37,920 --> 00:09:41,097 Because we assume its narrowness arises 184 00:09:41,097 --> 00:09:42,680 just because of the short [INAUDIBLE]. 185 00:09:42,680 --> 00:09:44,140 PROFESSOR: I will use an LED which 186 00:09:44,140 --> 00:09:45,860 has a few nanometer bandwidths. 187 00:09:45,860 --> 00:09:49,540 Use sunlight which has a few hundred nanometer bandwidths. 188 00:09:49,540 --> 00:09:50,850 Whatever your light source is. 189 00:09:55,850 --> 00:09:57,930 At this point, it's a general discussion. 190 00:09:57,930 --> 00:10:00,996 And I'm not going beyond the two limiting cases here. 191 00:10:00,996 --> 00:10:02,870 Of course, if you have a complicated spectral 192 00:10:02,870 --> 00:10:05,170 distribution, well, you're on your own 193 00:10:05,170 --> 00:10:07,700 to solve this integral. 194 00:10:07,700 --> 00:10:09,895 But at short times, we have this behavior. 195 00:10:09,895 --> 00:10:13,560 At long times, we have this. 196 00:10:13,560 --> 00:10:16,920 And the two regimes are separated 197 00:10:16,920 --> 00:10:21,410 by the time where I have a crossover in one case. 198 00:10:21,410 --> 00:10:24,310 This is broader and I can pull it out in the other case. 199 00:10:24,310 --> 00:10:27,370 This function is broader and I pull it out of the integral. 200 00:10:27,370 --> 00:10:29,480 And just where this happens, this 201 00:10:29,480 --> 00:10:33,710 is where we have the transition from t squared to t behavior. 202 00:10:33,710 --> 00:10:35,895 From coherent evolution to rate equation. 203 00:10:49,790 --> 00:10:50,290 OK. 204 00:10:57,595 --> 00:10:58,095 Yes. 205 00:11:07,700 --> 00:11:11,230 So let's now look at the situation of broadband light. 206 00:11:11,230 --> 00:11:13,600 Because later today I want to discuss with you 207 00:11:13,600 --> 00:11:15,380 Einstein's a and b coefficient. 208 00:11:15,380 --> 00:11:17,860 A very classical topic of atomic physics. 209 00:11:17,860 --> 00:11:20,980 A very famous concept introduced by Einstein. 210 00:11:20,980 --> 00:11:23,870 And actually I want to use the perturbation theory 211 00:11:23,870 --> 00:11:26,710 for broadband light which we have now formulated 212 00:11:26,710 --> 00:11:30,120 to derive for you the b coefficient of Einstein's a 213 00:11:30,120 --> 00:11:32,780 and b coefficient theory. 214 00:11:32,780 --> 00:11:33,280 OK. 215 00:11:33,280 --> 00:11:44,375 So for large time, we can now talk about rate. 216 00:11:49,450 --> 00:11:54,420 Which is the probability which increases linearly 217 00:11:54,420 --> 00:11:58,180 with time per unit time. 218 00:11:58,180 --> 00:12:04,160 And this was the matrix element squared. 219 00:12:04,160 --> 00:12:08,470 2 epsilon 0 h-bar squared, 2 pi. 220 00:12:08,470 --> 00:12:10,260 The 2 cancels. 221 00:12:10,260 --> 00:12:14,690 And then we have from the delta function, the spectral density 222 00:12:14,690 --> 00:12:15,690 at 0 detuning. 223 00:12:18,330 --> 00:12:20,755 Which is the spectral density at the resonance frequency. 224 00:12:27,570 --> 00:12:30,250 So we have a rate equation now. 225 00:12:30,250 --> 00:12:33,760 That the rate equation is the b coefficient. 226 00:12:33,760 --> 00:12:39,240 Einstein's famous b coefficient times the spectral density. 227 00:12:39,240 --> 00:12:44,530 And the b coefficient is now the proportionality 228 00:12:44,530 --> 00:12:48,640 constant between in the equation above. 229 00:12:48,640 --> 00:12:53,280 Which is pi d squared. 230 00:12:53,280 --> 00:12:57,500 But now in all the formula for the b coefficient, 231 00:12:57,500 --> 00:12:59,790 there's a factor of 3. 232 00:12:59,790 --> 00:13:04,770 Because the assumption is made that we have isotropy of space. 233 00:13:04,770 --> 00:13:07,160 The atom are randomly oriented. 234 00:13:07,160 --> 00:13:20,310 And, therefore, dx squared for given polarization, 235 00:13:20,310 --> 00:13:23,230 the dipole moment projected on a polarization of the light which 236 00:13:23,230 --> 00:13:27,462 is dx squared is just 1/3 of the absolute value 237 00:13:27,462 --> 00:13:28,670 of the dipole moment squared. 238 00:13:38,980 --> 00:13:41,640 So in other words, just to remind you 239 00:13:41,640 --> 00:13:45,300 what I have actually discussed is nothing else 240 00:13:45,300 --> 00:13:46,820 than Fermi's Golden Rule. 241 00:13:49,610 --> 00:13:53,030 And I could've reminded you of Fermi's Golden Rule 242 00:13:53,030 --> 00:13:55,490 where the rate is given. 243 00:13:55,490 --> 00:13:58,330 I just use a standard notation of textbooks. 244 00:13:58,330 --> 00:14:02,580 You take the matrix element squared, you multiply by 2 pi, 245 00:14:02,580 --> 00:14:04,135 and then you have a delta function. 246 00:14:06,780 --> 00:14:12,659 And the delta function implies a delta function is always 247 00:14:12,659 --> 00:14:14,200 a reminder that it needs integration. 248 00:14:18,740 --> 00:14:21,305 So whenever you have a delta function in Fermi's Golden 249 00:14:21,305 --> 00:14:24,980 Rule, you have to integrate. 250 00:14:24,980 --> 00:14:26,760 And there are two possibilities. 251 00:14:26,760 --> 00:14:31,710 You have to integrate over the spectrum of external fields. 252 00:14:31,710 --> 00:14:33,550 That's what we just did. 253 00:14:33,550 --> 00:14:38,610 The other possibility is, which doesn't apply to what we just 254 00:14:38,610 --> 00:14:41,350 discussed, that you have to integrate over 255 00:14:41,350 --> 00:14:43,120 a continuum of final states. 256 00:14:48,120 --> 00:14:50,790 This will be important when we use a Fermi's Golden Rule 257 00:14:50,790 --> 00:14:53,350 expression to talk about spontaneous emission 258 00:14:53,350 --> 00:14:56,574 where we have a continuum of final states. 259 00:14:56,574 --> 00:14:57,990 So anyway, I could have just said, 260 00:14:57,990 --> 00:14:59,700 let's start with Fermi's Golden Rule 261 00:14:59,700 --> 00:15:02,030 and let's jump to the final result. 262 00:15:02,030 --> 00:15:04,990 But I really wanted to emphasize here 263 00:15:04,990 --> 00:15:08,880 the sort of intimate connection between Rabi oscillation, 264 00:15:08,880 --> 00:15:11,090 the t square dependence, and how this 265 00:15:11,090 --> 00:15:12,730 turns into a rate equation. 266 00:15:22,500 --> 00:15:25,030 OK. 267 00:15:25,030 --> 00:15:33,106 Let's just summarize what we have done in a table. 268 00:15:36,600 --> 00:15:42,955 We have seen two different regime. 269 00:15:47,880 --> 00:15:50,990 In one case with the Rabi resonance, 270 00:15:50,990 --> 00:16:01,850 we are discussing a single final state of the atom. 271 00:16:01,850 --> 00:16:06,720 A single mode of the electromagnetic field. 272 00:16:06,720 --> 00:16:11,070 All energy levels, all states are discrete. 273 00:16:11,070 --> 00:16:18,650 We are talking about unitary reversible time evolution. 274 00:16:18,650 --> 00:16:21,650 When we had rate equations, we are 275 00:16:21,650 --> 00:16:25,750 talking about many final states. 276 00:16:25,750 --> 00:16:27,720 We integrate over them. 277 00:16:27,720 --> 00:16:36,870 Or and/or many modes of the external field. 278 00:16:36,870 --> 00:16:39,750 We are naturally dealing not with a discrete number, 279 00:16:39,750 --> 00:16:41,225 but with a continuum of states. 280 00:16:45,310 --> 00:16:49,360 The time evolution has become irreversible. 281 00:16:49,360 --> 00:16:53,090 And is therefore no longer unitary evolution, 282 00:16:53,090 --> 00:16:55,450 but it's a dissipative evolution. 283 00:17:00,210 --> 00:17:07,520 And all this came about not because we 284 00:17:07,520 --> 00:17:10,970 have spontaneous emission. 285 00:17:10,970 --> 00:17:12,919 I will tell you throughout this course 286 00:17:12,919 --> 00:17:15,300 that spontaneous emission is not as spontaneous 287 00:17:15,300 --> 00:17:17,200 as everybody assumes. 288 00:17:17,200 --> 00:17:20,349 Spontaneous emission is actually unitary time evolution. 289 00:17:20,349 --> 00:17:22,770 Unless you discard information. 290 00:17:22,770 --> 00:17:25,480 But a lot of people think rate equation irreversibility 291 00:17:25,480 --> 00:17:29,370 comes from something which is genuinely 292 00:17:29,370 --> 00:17:31,737 spontaneous and irreproducable. 293 00:17:31,737 --> 00:17:33,320 I don't know anything in physics which 294 00:17:33,320 --> 00:17:34,736 is spontaneous and irreproducible. 295 00:17:34,736 --> 00:17:35,890 But we come to that later. 296 00:17:35,890 --> 00:17:38,740 And this is an example where we obtain rate equation 297 00:17:38,740 --> 00:17:40,570 by simply driving a system. 298 00:17:40,570 --> 00:17:43,292 And the irreversibility comes by performing the integral 299 00:17:43,292 --> 00:17:44,375 over the spectral density. 300 00:17:47,410 --> 00:17:50,290 So let me just write that down. 301 00:17:50,290 --> 00:17:55,150 Due to integration. 302 00:17:57,810 --> 00:18:02,980 Since we integrate over an infinite number 303 00:18:02,980 --> 00:18:05,735 of modes or states. 304 00:18:14,050 --> 00:18:14,640 Any questions? 305 00:18:19,630 --> 00:18:20,310 OK, great. 306 00:18:20,310 --> 00:18:25,250 I wanted to make sure that this is very clear. 307 00:18:25,250 --> 00:18:29,130 OK, at this point, let me just summarize 308 00:18:29,130 --> 00:18:33,650 where we are in our discussion of atom light interaction. 309 00:18:33,650 --> 00:18:36,110 We've actually made a lot of progress. 310 00:18:36,110 --> 00:18:38,855 We have discussed matrix elements. 311 00:18:43,010 --> 00:18:48,450 We have discussed the coupling of atoms to an external field 312 00:18:48,450 --> 00:18:51,349 at the level of the Schroedinger equation. 313 00:18:51,349 --> 00:18:52,890 And we have done perturbation theory. 314 00:18:56,880 --> 00:19:01,310 And in perturbation theory, we found 315 00:19:01,310 --> 00:19:05,665 Rabi oscillations and we found rate equations. 316 00:19:09,830 --> 00:19:12,340 That's where we are right now. 317 00:19:12,340 --> 00:19:16,720 So the feature now which is missing 318 00:19:16,720 --> 00:19:19,500 is, of course, damping spontaneous emission 319 00:19:19,500 --> 00:19:22,790 irreversability-- another form of irreversibility. 320 00:19:22,790 --> 00:19:27,290 Right now our Rabi oscillations are undamped. 321 00:19:27,290 --> 00:19:29,290 Whether we obtain them in perturbation theory 322 00:19:29,290 --> 00:19:34,440 or whether we use the spin formalism to get them 323 00:19:34,440 --> 00:19:38,600 in the resonant in the strong coupling case. 324 00:19:38,600 --> 00:19:43,780 And here, for the rate equation, the way how we have solved it, 325 00:19:43,780 --> 00:19:46,250 the probability to be in the excited state 326 00:19:46,250 --> 00:19:48,164 just increases forever. 327 00:19:48,164 --> 00:19:49,830 The system will never reach equilibrium. 328 00:19:55,960 --> 00:20:00,726 But that means in both cases, we have a missing element. 329 00:20:00,726 --> 00:20:02,100 And this is spontaneous emission. 330 00:20:14,860 --> 00:20:16,720 So for the next hour or two, we'll 331 00:20:16,720 --> 00:20:19,140 talk about aspects of spontaneous emission. 332 00:20:19,140 --> 00:20:23,190 Spontaneous emission will actually eventually 333 00:20:23,190 --> 00:20:25,560 lead to damping of Rabi oscillation. 334 00:20:25,560 --> 00:20:29,070 And to a saturation of the excitation. 335 00:20:33,310 --> 00:20:36,330 OK, so we're now discussing spontaneous emission. 336 00:20:36,330 --> 00:20:39,490 And we will discuss it in actually three levels. 337 00:20:39,490 --> 00:20:48,180 One is I will discuss Einstein's a and b coefficients. 338 00:20:48,180 --> 00:20:50,390 I sometimes hesitate. 339 00:20:50,390 --> 00:20:52,489 Should I really discuss Einstein's a and b 340 00:20:52,489 --> 00:20:53,030 coefficients? 341 00:20:53,030 --> 00:20:54,890 It's sort of old fashioned. 342 00:20:54,890 --> 00:20:57,680 And I have already in perturbation theory 343 00:20:57,680 --> 00:20:59,660 given you a microscopic derivation 344 00:20:59,660 --> 00:21:01,620 of Einstein's b coefficient. 345 00:21:01,620 --> 00:21:05,960 But everybody who is an atomic physicist 346 00:21:05,960 --> 00:21:08,060 knows about Einstein's a and b coefficient. 347 00:21:08,060 --> 00:21:10,490 It was really a stroke of a genius to do it. 348 00:21:10,490 --> 00:21:12,920 And it becomes sort of our language. 349 00:21:12,920 --> 00:21:15,801 So what I'm doing here is I'm not beating it to death, 350 00:21:15,801 --> 00:21:17,425 but I give you sort of a short summary. 351 00:21:19,970 --> 00:21:22,450 It's also sort of I make a few comments which is actually 352 00:21:22,450 --> 00:21:24,040 amazing. 353 00:21:24,040 --> 00:21:27,280 How Einstein actually got results from the a and b 354 00:21:27,280 --> 00:21:31,280 coefficient which you can only get otherwise 355 00:21:31,280 --> 00:21:33,590 if you quantize electromagnetic field. 356 00:21:33,590 --> 00:21:35,560 So it's also sort of historically interesting 357 00:21:35,560 --> 00:21:40,480 that Einstein actually developed the theory of the a and b 358 00:21:40,480 --> 00:21:42,810 coefficient before the Schroedinger equation. 359 00:21:42,810 --> 00:21:44,970 Before quantum mechanics was developed. 360 00:21:44,970 --> 00:21:47,820 And often you call Schroedinger equation the first quantization 361 00:21:47,820 --> 00:21:51,180 and the field quantization, the second quantization. 362 00:21:51,180 --> 00:21:55,000 So in some sense, Einstein actually 363 00:21:55,000 --> 00:21:59,490 preempted or had already the results of second quantization 364 00:21:59,490 --> 00:22:02,450 before first quantization was developed. 365 00:22:02,450 --> 00:22:05,780 Anyway, it's a landmark paper, how Einstein did it. 366 00:22:05,780 --> 00:22:08,170 And that's why I want to discuss it. 367 00:22:08,170 --> 00:22:11,150 But it's partially also in order to give you 368 00:22:11,150 --> 00:22:13,180 the historical context. 369 00:22:13,180 --> 00:22:19,000 But then, of course, we want to use the modern formalism of use 370 00:22:19,000 --> 00:22:23,680 of quantization of the electromagnetic field. 371 00:22:23,680 --> 00:22:27,295 And we have already obtained just now the result 372 00:22:27,295 --> 00:22:31,650 for Einstein's b coefficient by just looking at the induced 373 00:22:31,650 --> 00:22:34,440 by the absorption rate or the stimulated rate. 374 00:22:34,440 --> 00:22:38,340 But then eventually having a microscopic quantization. 375 00:22:38,340 --> 00:22:41,260 By having a quantization of the electromagnetic field, 376 00:22:41,260 --> 00:22:49,060 we can also do now microscopic fully quantum first principle 377 00:22:49,060 --> 00:22:51,760 calculation of the a coefficient. 378 00:22:51,760 --> 00:22:53,510 So then we have already the b coefficient, 379 00:22:53,510 --> 00:22:56,730 we get the a coefficient out of microscopic calculation. 380 00:22:56,730 --> 00:22:59,187 So we don't really need Einstein's treatment of a and b 381 00:22:59,187 --> 00:22:59,770 at this point. 382 00:22:59,770 --> 00:23:03,840 But it's nice to see the connections. 383 00:23:03,840 --> 00:23:04,340 So anyway. 384 00:23:04,340 --> 00:23:05,740 So this is the agenda. 385 00:23:05,740 --> 00:23:07,870 Einstein's a and b coefficient to pull out 386 00:23:07,870 --> 00:23:11,350 spontaneous emission without even putting it in. 387 00:23:11,350 --> 00:23:14,000 Then we'll talk about field quantization which 388 00:23:14,000 --> 00:23:15,960 automatically leads us to a treatment 389 00:23:15,960 --> 00:23:19,070 of spontaneous emission. 390 00:23:19,070 --> 00:23:19,830 Any questions? 391 00:23:23,470 --> 00:23:28,935 So how was Einstein able to show that there 392 00:23:28,935 --> 00:23:33,540 is spontaneous emission without sort 393 00:23:33,540 --> 00:23:35,975 of knowing the quantum character of fields? 394 00:23:39,690 --> 00:23:43,714 Well, the point was he knew and understood 395 00:23:43,714 --> 00:23:45,380 that there would be thermal equilibrium. 396 00:23:48,540 --> 00:23:52,060 He said, I know what thermal equilibrium is. 397 00:23:52,060 --> 00:23:55,330 Thermal equilibrium is the Boltzmann coefficient. 398 00:23:55,330 --> 00:23:58,246 A Boltzmann probability for an atom 399 00:23:58,246 --> 00:23:59,370 to be in the excited state. 400 00:23:59,370 --> 00:24:00,830 The probability to be in the excited state 401 00:24:00,830 --> 00:24:02,780 is just the Boltzmann factor and depends 402 00:24:02,780 --> 00:24:06,360 on temperature in the usual way. 403 00:24:06,360 --> 00:24:09,710 And he also knew that the spectrum of light 404 00:24:09,710 --> 00:24:12,210 would follow a plank distribution. 405 00:24:12,210 --> 00:24:15,500 And if you put those things together, you go beyond that. 406 00:24:15,500 --> 00:24:17,750 Because you are in thermal equilibrium. 407 00:24:17,750 --> 00:24:20,470 This here what we derived so far does not 408 00:24:20,470 --> 00:24:21,580 have thermal equilibrium. 409 00:24:21,580 --> 00:24:23,950 And thermal equilibrium only comes 410 00:24:23,950 --> 00:24:26,460 through the damping of spontaneous emission. 411 00:24:26,460 --> 00:24:31,010 So, therefore, by Einstein just using Boltzmann distribution 412 00:24:31,010 --> 00:24:34,880 and Planck law, he got spontaneous emission. 413 00:24:34,880 --> 00:24:37,456 And this is what I just want to show you. 414 00:24:37,456 --> 00:24:38,830 For most of you, it's a reminder. 415 00:24:43,510 --> 00:24:44,010 OK. 416 00:24:44,010 --> 00:24:45,680 Einstein's a and b coefficients. 417 00:25:04,820 --> 00:25:08,660 I will post one of Einstein's papers on the website. 418 00:25:08,660 --> 00:25:11,450 He was also the first to actually discuss 419 00:25:11,450 --> 00:25:13,750 mechanical forces of light. 420 00:25:13,750 --> 00:25:18,710 He realized that if you have a gas at a temperature which 421 00:25:18,710 --> 00:25:21,830 is different from the temperature in the womb, 422 00:25:21,830 --> 00:25:24,040 the gas has to equilibrate. 423 00:25:24,040 --> 00:25:29,270 And the gas can only equilibrate loose, excess velocity 424 00:25:29,270 --> 00:25:34,480 by transferring its momentum to the photons. 425 00:25:34,480 --> 00:25:37,360 So some equations of laser cooling, the fact 426 00:25:37,360 --> 00:25:40,240 that light can exchange momentum with a particle. 427 00:25:40,240 --> 00:25:43,610 And this is eventually what leads to equilibrium, 428 00:25:43,610 --> 00:25:48,232 was already in papers at the beginning of the 20th century. 429 00:25:48,232 --> 00:25:50,190 And it's just amazing if you read those papers. 430 00:25:50,190 --> 00:25:53,530 How modern the language is and how clear the language is. 431 00:25:53,530 --> 00:25:56,520 But here, I'm not talking about the mechanical effects. 432 00:25:56,520 --> 00:25:58,540 But the mechanical effects of light 433 00:25:58,540 --> 00:26:05,590 which many people in this class use for a living, this 434 00:26:05,590 --> 00:26:07,340 is actually part of this equation. 435 00:26:07,340 --> 00:26:10,410 Because the equilibrium between-- again, 436 00:26:10,410 --> 00:26:12,970 I discuss here Einstein's a and b coefficient-- 437 00:26:12,970 --> 00:26:17,410 the equilibrium between the electronic structure, 438 00:26:17,410 --> 00:26:20,060 the ground and excited state with a photon field. 439 00:26:20,060 --> 00:26:22,740 But Einstein also considered the equilibrium 440 00:26:22,740 --> 00:26:25,360 between the motional degree of the atom. 441 00:26:25,360 --> 00:26:27,390 And equilibrium between the motional degree 442 00:26:27,390 --> 00:26:29,800 of the atom and the radiation field 443 00:26:29,800 --> 00:26:33,140 requires the spontaneous force. 444 00:26:33,140 --> 00:26:35,830 The spontaneous radiation force. 445 00:26:35,830 --> 00:26:38,120 I'm not discussing it here. 446 00:26:38,120 --> 00:26:42,580 But I'm discussing here is now an equilibrium between ground 447 00:26:42,580 --> 00:26:44,250 state and excited state. 448 00:26:56,450 --> 00:27:03,520 So the probability to find an atom in the excited state 449 00:27:03,520 --> 00:27:10,390 is simply described by the Boltzmann factor. 450 00:27:13,470 --> 00:27:15,450 Now it's traditional in the discussion 451 00:27:15,450 --> 00:27:16,960 of Einstein's a and b coefficient 452 00:27:16,960 --> 00:27:24,260 to allow for degeneracy factors at ground and excited state. 453 00:27:24,260 --> 00:27:27,620 I have to say I usually hate that I 454 00:27:27,620 --> 00:27:28,960 try not to talk about levels. 455 00:27:28,960 --> 00:27:30,900 I just talk about quantum states. 456 00:27:30,900 --> 00:27:33,800 Non-degenerate individual quantum states. 457 00:27:33,800 --> 00:27:36,720 So in that sense, I try to characterize population 458 00:27:36,720 --> 00:27:39,070 in a quantum state, not in a level. 459 00:27:39,070 --> 00:27:42,230 But it is standard to follow Einstein's concept 460 00:27:42,230 --> 00:27:44,270 where we have degeneracies. 461 00:27:44,270 --> 00:27:47,920 I'm not emphasizing them here, but I will just 462 00:27:47,920 --> 00:27:50,610 write them down where they belong. 463 00:27:50,610 --> 00:27:52,430 OK, so this takes care. 464 00:27:52,430 --> 00:27:58,240 We know what is a fraction of atoms in the excited state. 465 00:27:58,240 --> 00:28:00,890 So this is the equilibrium. 466 00:28:00,890 --> 00:28:10,720 The next thing we need is the light. 467 00:28:10,720 --> 00:28:14,080 And Einstein assumed that it's a spectral density 468 00:28:14,080 --> 00:28:15,740 in a black-body cavity. 469 00:28:21,010 --> 00:28:27,710 So we need the energy density per frequency interval. 470 00:28:27,710 --> 00:28:31,210 And this is nothing else than the occupation number 471 00:28:31,210 --> 00:28:36,730 of the mode times the energy of the photon. 472 00:28:36,730 --> 00:28:41,185 Times the density of states. 473 00:28:46,630 --> 00:28:50,360 The photon number per mode is just 474 00:28:50,360 --> 00:28:57,650 given by the Bose-Einstein factor. 475 00:28:57,650 --> 00:29:01,040 Bose-Einstein statistics factor. 476 00:29:01,040 --> 00:29:10,710 The mode density is, as you know, in three dimension. 477 00:29:10,710 --> 00:29:14,720 Omega squared, pi square over c cube. 478 00:29:19,950 --> 00:29:28,470 So, therefore, the spectral density of black-body radiation 479 00:29:28,470 --> 00:29:33,430 has-- and we need that, and omega cube dependence. 480 00:29:38,180 --> 00:29:47,380 And then it has this Bose-Einstein denominator 481 00:29:47,380 --> 00:29:48,810 in the well-known form. 482 00:29:48,810 --> 00:29:52,460 So this is now Planck's black-body spectrum 483 00:29:52,460 --> 00:29:54,190 in the units where we need it. 484 00:29:57,410 --> 00:30:07,110 So all we need is now to find the famous Einstein a and b 485 00:30:07,110 --> 00:30:08,090 coefficient. 486 00:30:08,090 --> 00:30:11,270 We have to write down a rate equation for the atoms. 487 00:30:17,660 --> 00:30:20,820 So the fact is we know already what equilibrium is. 488 00:30:20,820 --> 00:30:23,050 Excited state versus ground state population 489 00:30:23,050 --> 00:30:24,310 is the Boltzmann factor. 490 00:30:24,310 --> 00:30:26,100 But now we write down a rate equation 491 00:30:26,100 --> 00:30:28,040 which involves a black-body field. 492 00:30:28,040 --> 00:30:31,410 And then we compare the solution of the rate equation 493 00:30:31,410 --> 00:30:33,520 to the solution we already know. 494 00:30:33,520 --> 00:30:37,170 And from that, we get Einstein's a and b coefficient. 495 00:30:37,170 --> 00:30:47,860 OK, so the change in the population of the excited state 496 00:30:47,860 --> 00:30:51,270 has three different terms. 497 00:30:51,270 --> 00:30:58,360 One is the energy density of the black-body radiation 498 00:30:58,360 --> 00:31:04,080 can cause stimulated emission. 499 00:31:11,004 --> 00:31:12,920 So, therefore, it's proportional to the number 500 00:31:12,920 --> 00:31:14,460 of atoms in the excited state. 501 00:31:20,140 --> 00:31:22,480 The energy density of the black-body radiation 502 00:31:22,480 --> 00:31:25,464 can cause absorption. 503 00:31:25,464 --> 00:31:26,880 This is proportional to the number 504 00:31:26,880 --> 00:31:28,280 of atoms in the ground state. 505 00:31:44,190 --> 00:31:49,800 And then this equation as it stands 506 00:31:49,800 --> 00:31:51,700 would lead to contradiction when I compare 507 00:31:51,700 --> 00:31:55,040 the solution of this equation to the Boltzmann factor we already 508 00:31:55,040 --> 00:31:56,220 know. 509 00:31:56,220 --> 00:32:01,800 And the only way to fix it is to add an extra term. 510 00:32:01,800 --> 00:32:03,450 Which is spontaneous emission. 511 00:32:06,710 --> 00:32:09,800 If spontaneous emission were not necessary, 512 00:32:09,800 --> 00:32:13,550 this a coefficient could in the end turn out to be 0. 513 00:32:13,550 --> 00:32:15,320 Or it can be undetermined. 514 00:32:15,320 --> 00:32:18,355 But as we see, it is necessary for consistency. 515 00:32:22,760 --> 00:32:25,955 So this is pretty much the famous rate equation. 516 00:32:34,790 --> 00:32:38,005 And we are interested in the equilibrium solution. 517 00:32:41,850 --> 00:32:50,640 In equilibrium, all derivatives vanish. 518 00:32:50,640 --> 00:33:02,120 And then by setting the derivatives to 0, 519 00:33:02,120 --> 00:33:03,980 I have one equation. 520 00:33:03,980 --> 00:33:11,970 And I will rewrite the equation by putting the spectral density 521 00:33:11,970 --> 00:33:13,740 of the light on one side. 522 00:33:17,450 --> 00:33:19,280 And everything else on the other side. 523 00:33:19,280 --> 00:33:22,976 And what we have here is the a coefficient. 524 00:33:26,650 --> 00:33:30,660 The ground state population, the excited state population. 525 00:33:30,660 --> 00:33:31,423 The b coefficient. 526 00:33:40,910 --> 00:33:43,570 So this is the spectral density of-- it's 527 00:33:43,570 --> 00:33:46,340 just an expression for the spectral density. 528 00:33:46,340 --> 00:33:52,570 We want to put in now that the excited state fraction is 529 00:33:52,570 --> 00:33:55,640 given by a Boltzmann factor. 530 00:33:55,640 --> 00:34:04,650 So, therefore, Ne over Ng becomes the Boltzmann factor. 531 00:34:04,650 --> 00:34:07,310 And, yes, there are these degeneracy factors. 532 00:34:12,320 --> 00:34:15,060 So I've pretty much divided the denominator and the numerator 533 00:34:15,060 --> 00:34:18,120 by the population in the excited state. 534 00:34:18,120 --> 00:34:21,350 And here I get Beg 535 00:34:21,350 --> 00:34:26,170 OK, so this is the result for the spectral density. 536 00:34:26,170 --> 00:34:31,409 But we know already that the spectral density 537 00:34:31,409 --> 00:34:33,570 has to be of the Planck form. 538 00:34:33,570 --> 00:34:35,870 So now we can simply compare what 539 00:34:35,870 --> 00:34:39,170 we know to what we obtained from the rate equation 540 00:34:39,170 --> 00:34:41,435 and make sure that it matches. 541 00:34:44,139 --> 00:34:53,580 So it's good we have the exponential factor. 542 00:34:53,580 --> 00:34:57,580 And by bringing this expression to the form 543 00:34:57,580 --> 00:34:59,720 of the other expression, we actually 544 00:34:59,720 --> 00:35:02,730 have to fulfill two conditions. 545 00:35:02,730 --> 00:35:07,060 One is in order to make sure that kind 546 00:35:07,060 --> 00:35:10,440 of the total expression is OK, it gives us a ratio. 547 00:35:10,440 --> 00:35:12,290 The Planck body spectrum is normalized. 548 00:35:12,290 --> 00:35:14,080 There is no unknown prefactor. 549 00:35:14,080 --> 00:35:17,250 So this determines the ratio of a and b. 550 00:35:17,250 --> 00:35:21,910 And also since we have this functional form 551 00:35:21,910 --> 00:35:23,730 of the Bose-Einstein statistics which 552 00:35:23,730 --> 00:35:25,930 has this exponential factor minus 1, 553 00:35:25,930 --> 00:35:29,640 it gives us also a relation between the 2B coefficient. 554 00:35:29,640 --> 00:35:32,697 That one is the b coefficient for stimulated emission. 555 00:35:32,697 --> 00:35:34,280 And the other one is the b coefficient 556 00:35:34,280 --> 00:35:35,155 for force absorption. 557 00:35:40,791 --> 00:35:41,290 OK. 558 00:35:41,290 --> 00:35:45,880 So with that, we have the relation 559 00:35:45,880 --> 00:35:48,460 between the a coefficient and the b coefficient. 560 00:35:55,940 --> 00:36:05,950 And we find that the B coefficient for absorption 561 00:36:05,950 --> 00:36:08,537 and emission are the same. 562 00:36:08,537 --> 00:36:10,370 Well, we know it's the same coupling matrix. 563 00:36:10,370 --> 00:36:12,340 I mean, the Hamiltonian which connects ground 564 00:36:12,340 --> 00:36:14,840 to excited state, excited state to ground state. 565 00:36:14,840 --> 00:36:17,650 But if you really want to deal with degenerate states 566 00:36:17,650 --> 00:36:22,720 and not formulated for states, you have degeneracy factors. 567 00:36:22,720 --> 00:36:26,820 OK So I could stop here. 568 00:36:26,820 --> 00:36:28,960 This is sort of the textbook result. 569 00:36:28,960 --> 00:36:34,150 But I want to rewrite the result that we recognize 570 00:36:34,150 --> 00:36:37,120 the quantization of the electromagnetic field. 571 00:36:37,120 --> 00:36:41,300 So instead of just looking at the power in Planck spectrum, 572 00:36:41,300 --> 00:36:42,990 spectral density, and such. 573 00:36:42,990 --> 00:36:49,790 I want to bring in the photon number. 574 00:36:49,790 --> 00:36:52,140 I've already given you the Bose-Einstein distribution 575 00:36:52,140 --> 00:36:54,140 for the photon number in the mode. 576 00:36:54,140 --> 00:36:59,795 So I take now equation a and multiply it 577 00:36:59,795 --> 00:37:02,640 with the average photon number in a mode of omega. 578 00:37:11,010 --> 00:37:23,420 This gives me on the left hand side-- 579 00:37:23,420 --> 00:37:25,230 I'm multiplying this with a photon number. 580 00:37:25,230 --> 00:37:28,650 So on the left hand side, I have a times the photon number. 581 00:37:28,650 --> 00:37:32,990 On the right hand side, when I put in the photon number, 582 00:37:32,990 --> 00:37:34,800 the photon number with this expression 583 00:37:34,800 --> 00:37:37,800 just give me the Planck distribution, 584 00:37:37,800 --> 00:37:40,950 the spectral energy. 585 00:37:40,950 --> 00:37:47,550 So yes. 586 00:37:47,550 --> 00:37:53,840 This gives me the spectral energy density 587 00:37:53,840 --> 00:37:54,850 times the b coefficient. 588 00:38:05,245 --> 00:38:05,745 Yes. 589 00:38:11,130 --> 00:38:14,590 And this is nothing else than stimulated emission. 590 00:38:14,590 --> 00:38:18,340 So we realize that stimulated emission 591 00:38:18,340 --> 00:38:21,660 is nothing else than n times the photon number. 592 00:38:21,660 --> 00:38:28,510 The photon number n times spontaneous emission. 593 00:38:28,510 --> 00:38:39,700 Similarly, we know that the rate for absorption 594 00:38:39,700 --> 00:38:46,040 becomes now, well, the same unless we 595 00:38:46,040 --> 00:38:49,340 have degeneracy factors. 596 00:38:49,340 --> 00:38:54,030 But just for the fundamental discussion, 597 00:38:54,030 --> 00:38:56,130 let's avoid the [? p ?] counting how many 598 00:38:56,130 --> 00:38:57,760 degenerate levels a level have. 599 00:38:57,760 --> 00:38:59,970 Let's just assume we have a situation that we just 600 00:38:59,970 --> 00:39:01,320 count every state individually. 601 00:39:19,420 --> 00:39:22,220 Then I can summarize this result saw in the following. 602 00:39:25,000 --> 00:39:32,010 That the total rate for emission was 603 00:39:32,010 --> 00:39:35,700 proportional to n for stimulated emission. 604 00:39:35,700 --> 00:39:40,350 And then we have the extra 1 for spontaneous emission. 605 00:39:40,350 --> 00:39:45,180 Whereas the rate for absorption was 606 00:39:45,180 --> 00:39:46,970 n times the spontaneous emission. 607 00:39:51,900 --> 00:39:57,510 So we find that this important formula that emission 608 00:39:57,510 --> 00:40:00,140 has an n plus 1 factor. 609 00:40:00,140 --> 00:40:03,560 Absorption has an n factor. 610 00:40:03,560 --> 00:40:06,030 And it is, of course, this extra plus 1 611 00:40:06,030 --> 00:40:09,340 which was absolutely crucial to establish thermal equilibrium. 612 00:40:09,340 --> 00:40:11,850 If a had been 0, no thermal equilibrium 613 00:40:11,850 --> 00:40:12,980 would have been reached. 614 00:40:17,150 --> 00:40:20,480 So in other words, what is already 615 00:40:20,480 --> 00:40:23,350 in Einstein's treatment of the a and b coefficient 616 00:40:23,350 --> 00:40:26,600 is that if you understand absorption, which 617 00:40:26,600 --> 00:40:29,780 you can understand with the Schroedinger equation, 618 00:40:29,780 --> 00:40:32,260 and you understand and you write it 619 00:40:32,260 --> 00:40:36,610 in the fundamental way in photon numbers, 620 00:40:36,610 --> 00:40:39,780 then spontaneous emission is just 621 00:40:39,780 --> 00:40:42,180 the rate of absorption divided by n. 622 00:40:44,710 --> 00:40:49,010 Spontaneous emission is like induced emission in its rate. 623 00:40:49,010 --> 00:40:50,680 But by just one single photon. 624 00:40:55,190 --> 00:40:57,636 So as I pointed out, this is a result which is usually 625 00:40:57,636 --> 00:40:59,010 obtained with second quantization 626 00:40:59,010 --> 00:41:02,440 and it is already included in Einstein's a and b coefficient. 627 00:41:05,600 --> 00:41:07,270 So we could stop here. 628 00:41:07,270 --> 00:41:09,420 We have already a major result which is usually 629 00:41:09,420 --> 00:41:11,000 obtained in field quantization. 630 00:41:11,000 --> 00:41:13,639 But there is one deficiency and we want clearly 631 00:41:13,639 --> 00:41:15,680 fix it and move on to the microscopic derivation. 632 00:41:15,680 --> 00:41:17,300 And this is the following. 633 00:41:17,300 --> 00:41:20,350 Right now, we really assume black-body radiation. 634 00:41:20,350 --> 00:41:23,170 And this ratio n plus 1 over n was only 635 00:41:23,170 --> 00:41:25,920 derived for average photon numbers 636 00:41:25,920 --> 00:41:28,330 in a spectrally broad field. 637 00:41:28,330 --> 00:41:32,070 And what is left for microscopic treatment which 638 00:41:32,070 --> 00:41:36,530 I want to present now is even if you have just a single mode, 639 00:41:36,530 --> 00:41:39,170 the atom can only interact with a single mode. 640 00:41:39,170 --> 00:41:41,670 We find that stimulated emission and absorption 641 00:41:41,670 --> 00:41:45,330 is proportional to n, the number of photons already present. 642 00:41:45,330 --> 00:41:49,110 And then there is plus 1 for spontaneous emission. 643 00:41:49,110 --> 00:41:53,700 So in other words, we do it now sort of microscopically again. 644 00:41:53,700 --> 00:41:56,480 And what we get out of it is that everything 645 00:41:56,480 --> 00:41:58,470 we learned from Einstein's a and b coefficient 646 00:41:58,470 --> 00:42:00,400 is not just valid in thermal equilibrium. 647 00:42:00,400 --> 00:42:02,560 It's not just valid for average numbers. 648 00:42:02,560 --> 00:42:05,101 It's really valid for single mode physics. 649 00:42:10,880 --> 00:42:13,110 OK, so the agenda is what is next. 650 00:42:26,910 --> 00:42:27,410 Is valid. 651 00:42:32,680 --> 00:42:33,180 4n. 652 00:42:36,640 --> 00:42:39,590 So this expression is valid not only 653 00:42:39,590 --> 00:42:46,280 for an average over many modes, but for each single mode. 654 00:42:57,750 --> 00:43:01,644 Questions about Einstein's a and b coefficient? 655 00:43:10,550 --> 00:43:11,180 OK. 656 00:43:11,180 --> 00:43:14,680 So we spend now the rest of today and parts 657 00:43:14,680 --> 00:43:17,880 of next Monday in a microscopic derivation 658 00:43:17,880 --> 00:43:21,260 of spontaneous emission using field quantization. 659 00:43:21,260 --> 00:43:22,825 But I just want to make you aware 660 00:43:22,825 --> 00:43:25,040 that we know already what it is. 661 00:43:25,040 --> 00:43:26,615 We have a semi-classical derivation 662 00:43:26,615 --> 00:43:28,550 of the b coefficient. 663 00:43:28,550 --> 00:43:31,600 And Einstein's treatment gives us the ratio of a and b. 664 00:43:31,600 --> 00:43:33,610 So we know already at this point what 665 00:43:33,610 --> 00:43:35,720 the rate of spontaneous emission is. 666 00:43:35,720 --> 00:43:38,150 But it is nice. 667 00:43:38,150 --> 00:43:40,900 I think also important for our education 668 00:43:40,900 --> 00:43:43,200 to obtain it in a microscopic way 669 00:43:43,200 --> 00:43:54,110 where we really show how we have to-- sum overall modes 670 00:43:54,110 --> 00:43:56,866 and such to obtain the expression. 671 00:43:56,866 --> 00:43:58,240 Also I want to ask you questions. 672 00:43:58,240 --> 00:43:59,775 I want to ask you clicker questions afterwards. 673 00:43:59,775 --> 00:44:01,630 And one clicker question for you is 674 00:44:01,630 --> 00:44:03,180 what happens to spontaneous emission 675 00:44:03,180 --> 00:44:05,210 in one and two dimension? 676 00:44:05,210 --> 00:44:07,130 Certain things will change. 677 00:44:07,130 --> 00:44:11,200 And it's much clearer what will change 678 00:44:11,200 --> 00:44:14,300 if you have a clear understanding how we sum up 679 00:44:14,300 --> 00:44:15,060 all of the modes. 680 00:44:15,060 --> 00:44:17,630 How all the possible modes contribute 681 00:44:17,630 --> 00:44:20,530 to spontaneous emission. 682 00:44:20,530 --> 00:44:22,930 And, of course, in two dimension and one dimension, 683 00:44:22,930 --> 00:44:26,270 you have a different density of modes. 684 00:44:26,270 --> 00:44:31,150 So with that motivation, we need a quantized electromagnetic 685 00:44:31,150 --> 00:44:32,666 field. 686 00:44:32,666 --> 00:44:35,480 Where we quantize the field for each mode. 687 00:44:35,480 --> 00:44:38,456 And then we go back, we do the summation of all modes. 688 00:44:38,456 --> 00:44:40,080 And we've really understood in the most 689 00:44:40,080 --> 00:44:42,855 fundamental and microscopic way how photons and light interact. 690 00:44:47,380 --> 00:44:50,990 OK, so our next chapter is the quantization 691 00:44:50,990 --> 00:44:52,280 of the radiation field. 692 00:45:05,350 --> 00:45:06,785 We do-- yes, [INAUDIBLE]? 693 00:45:06,785 --> 00:45:09,260 AUDIENCE: I just have a question. 694 00:45:09,260 --> 00:45:12,725 So when we compare the rate equation and the distribution 695 00:45:12,725 --> 00:45:17,675 of the photons, so there is a parameter, t, in both of them. 696 00:45:17,675 --> 00:45:20,645 So we just assume two t's are the same because 697 00:45:20,645 --> 00:45:22,625 of their reaching thermal equilibrium. 698 00:45:22,625 --> 00:45:23,730 PROFESSOR: Oh, yeah. 699 00:45:23,730 --> 00:45:24,230 Absolutely. 700 00:45:24,230 --> 00:45:28,430 I mean this is, of course, what Einstein assumed 701 00:45:28,430 --> 00:45:31,770 that the thermal equilibrium for atoms with the Boltzmann 702 00:45:31,770 --> 00:45:32,850 factor. 703 00:45:32,850 --> 00:45:36,690 And the thermal equilibrium for photons described at the Planck 704 00:45:36,690 --> 00:45:39,305 distribution have to be reached at the same temperature. 705 00:45:43,130 --> 00:45:45,860 It was a thermodynamical argument 706 00:45:45,860 --> 00:45:48,240 assuming which is, of course, one 707 00:45:48,240 --> 00:45:52,490 of the tenets of statistical physics of thermodynamics. 708 00:45:52,490 --> 00:45:56,200 If you have two systems and they interact with each other, 709 00:45:56,200 --> 00:45:58,817 they equilibrate at the same temperature. 710 00:46:02,230 --> 00:46:03,540 Yes, this is very important. 711 00:46:03,540 --> 00:46:05,081 This was a very important assumption. 712 00:46:10,650 --> 00:46:16,100 Of course, as we know, when we have ultra cold atoms in a room 713 00:46:16,100 --> 00:46:18,690 temperature vacuum chamber, the atoms do not equilibrate. 714 00:46:21,490 --> 00:46:25,850 But if you would trap them for an infinite amount of time, 715 00:46:25,850 --> 00:46:28,180 they would equilibrate. 716 00:46:28,180 --> 00:46:31,512 It's just that we lose the atoms from our trap. 717 00:46:31,512 --> 00:46:33,595 They're knocked out by [INAUDIBLE] gas collisions. 718 00:46:33,595 --> 00:46:35,650 A lot of other things happen. 719 00:46:35,650 --> 00:46:39,750 But if you could isolate just ultra cold atoms in a trap, 720 00:46:39,750 --> 00:46:42,350 they would stay in this trap forever. 721 00:46:42,350 --> 00:46:46,060 There would be no other effect shortening our observation 722 00:46:46,060 --> 00:46:46,660 time. 723 00:46:46,660 --> 00:46:50,800 Eventually, the atoms would just boil out of your trap 724 00:46:50,800 --> 00:46:52,590 because black-body radiation. 725 00:46:52,590 --> 00:46:55,390 Momentum transfer from black-body photons 726 00:46:55,390 --> 00:46:58,815 heats the atoms up to room temperature. 727 00:47:01,680 --> 00:47:06,210 And this is, of course, one of the things which really amaze 728 00:47:06,210 --> 00:47:08,520 people when laser cooling came along. 729 00:47:08,520 --> 00:47:11,610 You know, everything at low temperature was cryogenic. 730 00:47:11,610 --> 00:47:13,110 If you want to keep a sample cold, 731 00:47:13,110 --> 00:47:17,640 you had to put liquid nitrogen shields, helium shields. 732 00:47:17,640 --> 00:47:20,934 You had to put multiple shields around-- 733 00:47:20,934 --> 00:47:22,350 if you had an optical [INAUDIBLE], 734 00:47:22,350 --> 00:47:24,830 you had a window of liquid nitrogen temperature. 735 00:47:24,830 --> 00:47:26,900 One window at helium temperature. 736 00:47:26,900 --> 00:47:29,690 Just to make sure that the black-body radiation 737 00:47:29,690 --> 00:47:31,410 is absorbed and blocked. 738 00:47:31,410 --> 00:47:34,090 Because it would've been absolutely detrimental 739 00:47:34,090 --> 00:47:36,670 if you had a sample at very low temperature 740 00:47:36,670 --> 00:47:40,520 and it would've been exposed to black-body radiation. 741 00:47:40,520 --> 00:47:43,720 So it's really a unique feature of the atoms 742 00:47:43,720 --> 00:47:48,255 that they are, and this is what you will calculate 743 00:47:48,255 --> 00:47:52,380 in this week's problem set, that the atoms are almost completely 744 00:47:52,380 --> 00:47:54,720 transparent to the black-body radiation. 745 00:47:54,720 --> 00:47:58,970 They only react if the hyperfine frequency or they react far, 746 00:47:58,970 --> 00:48:01,300 far, far, far, far off in the tail 747 00:48:01,300 --> 00:48:04,810 of the black-body radiation with an electronic transition. 748 00:48:04,810 --> 00:48:07,850 But nevertheless, as Einstein has taught us, 749 00:48:07,850 --> 00:48:10,840 and as we know from general principles, 750 00:48:10,840 --> 00:48:14,020 this will not mean that the atoms 751 00:48:14,020 --> 00:48:17,940 stay cold and are decoupled. 752 00:48:17,940 --> 00:48:23,260 It just means that it takes maybe the age of the universe. 753 00:48:23,260 --> 00:48:24,990 I've never calculated the number. 754 00:48:24,990 --> 00:48:28,415 It would really take forever until the atoms in the atom 755 00:48:28,415 --> 00:48:35,320 trap reach the ambient temperature. 756 00:48:35,320 --> 00:48:38,180 So Einstein's argument was an idealized argument 757 00:48:38,180 --> 00:48:39,740 which in practice would never happen. 758 00:48:39,740 --> 00:48:42,310 But if you exclude all other processes, 759 00:48:42,310 --> 00:48:44,490 you have a consistent system by saying 760 00:48:44,490 --> 00:48:47,100 I only have atoms with their kinetic energy. 761 00:48:47,100 --> 00:48:48,740 I have black-body radiation. 762 00:48:48,740 --> 00:48:51,320 And everything has to equilibrate. 763 00:48:51,320 --> 00:48:53,130 And as I said before, the argument 764 00:48:53,130 --> 00:48:55,160 for Einstein's a and b coefficient 765 00:48:55,160 --> 00:48:58,770 simply assumes that the ground and excited state population 766 00:48:58,770 --> 00:48:59,850 equilibrium. 767 00:48:59,850 --> 00:49:02,010 But you can carry the argument even further 768 00:49:02,010 --> 00:49:05,230 and say even the Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity 769 00:49:05,230 --> 00:49:08,090 distribution of the atoms has to equilibrate 770 00:49:08,090 --> 00:49:10,120 at the ambient temperature. 771 00:49:10,120 --> 00:49:11,200 Beautiful argument. 772 00:49:14,120 --> 00:49:15,700 And what you find from this argument 773 00:49:15,700 --> 00:49:16,700 is it's really amazing. 774 00:49:16,700 --> 00:49:19,560 You find the photon recall is h-bar k. 775 00:49:19,560 --> 00:49:24,300 Einstein pulled it out simply by making this assumption. 776 00:49:24,300 --> 00:49:27,240 I will post the paper on that. 777 00:49:27,240 --> 00:49:28,960 OK, field quantization. 778 00:49:33,200 --> 00:49:36,190 We discuss the quantization of the electromagnetic field 779 00:49:36,190 --> 00:49:38,200 really from first principles. 780 00:49:38,200 --> 00:49:41,990 From vector potential, radiation field, Coulomb gauge, 781 00:49:41,990 --> 00:49:45,480 transverse vector potential, in 8422. 782 00:49:45,480 --> 00:49:48,240 So we dedicate one or two classes 783 00:49:48,240 --> 00:49:52,770 to just discuss all the steps to have 784 00:49:52,770 --> 00:49:55,800 full quantization of the electromagnetic field 785 00:49:55,800 --> 00:49:58,080 with all the bells and whistles. 786 00:49:58,080 --> 00:49:59,910 So sometimes when I teach this course, 787 00:49:59,910 --> 00:50:02,647 I say, well, you've heard about field quantization, 788 00:50:02,647 --> 00:50:03,480 I can refer to that. 789 00:50:03,480 --> 00:50:06,080 Or I can refer you to 8422. 790 00:50:06,080 --> 00:50:09,420 But in the end I thought, why don't I just give you 791 00:50:09,420 --> 00:50:10,425 a 10 minute derivation. 792 00:50:10,425 --> 00:50:14,160 Just sort of focusing on the essential because this 793 00:50:14,160 --> 00:50:16,005 makes this cause more self-contained 794 00:50:16,005 --> 00:50:18,060 and more complete. 795 00:50:18,060 --> 00:50:21,280 So I give you now a ten minute quantization 796 00:50:21,280 --> 00:50:22,820 of the electromagnetic field. 797 00:50:22,820 --> 00:50:26,100 Pretty much going straight to showing you 798 00:50:26,100 --> 00:50:28,297 electromagnetic field isn't harmonic oscillator. 799 00:50:28,297 --> 00:50:30,005 And now let's use the quantum description 800 00:50:30,005 --> 00:50:31,280 of the harmonic oscillator. 801 00:50:31,280 --> 00:50:33,060 And then we have a quantum description 802 00:50:33,060 --> 00:50:35,990 of the electromagnetic field. 803 00:50:35,990 --> 00:50:38,855 So this is not rigorous, but it is logically compete. 804 00:50:42,650 --> 00:50:45,450 So we focus in the discussion of the quantization 805 00:50:45,450 --> 00:50:48,040 of the electromagnetic field, we focus just 806 00:50:48,040 --> 00:50:51,180 on a single mode of the electromagnetic field. 807 00:50:54,560 --> 00:50:56,450 Each mode will be an harmonic oscillator. 808 00:50:56,450 --> 00:50:59,549 And then we have many harmonic oscillators 809 00:50:59,549 --> 00:51:01,090 comprising the electromagnetic field. 810 00:51:05,020 --> 00:51:11,150 So a even single mode, we assume that we have plain waves 811 00:51:11,150 --> 00:51:13,170 with a polarization, with an amplitude. 812 00:51:26,980 --> 00:51:29,730 The electric field is the derivative 813 00:51:29,730 --> 00:51:32,950 of the vector potential. 814 00:51:32,950 --> 00:51:37,520 And the shortest way to show you an analogy 815 00:51:37,520 --> 00:51:40,940 with the harmonic oscillator is to remind you 816 00:51:40,940 --> 00:51:45,570 that the total energy-- which is actually 817 00:51:45,570 --> 00:51:48,610 if you're wondering about a factor of 2, 818 00:51:48,610 --> 00:51:52,870 the electric and the magnetic part, the total energy 819 00:51:52,870 --> 00:52:02,090 is quadratic in the amplitude of the vector potential. 820 00:52:08,340 --> 00:52:10,210 By the way, there is a factor of 1/2 821 00:52:10,210 --> 00:52:12,250 because if you have a sinusoidal variation, 822 00:52:12,250 --> 00:52:15,130 you take the time average, cosine squared, which is 1/2. 823 00:52:18,070 --> 00:52:24,920 Well, if the total energy is quadratic in the amplitude, 824 00:52:24,920 --> 00:52:31,160 this immediately allows us to draw analogies 825 00:52:31,160 --> 00:52:33,095 to an harmonic oscillator. 826 00:52:35,620 --> 00:52:39,170 And we can use the vector potential 827 00:52:39,170 --> 00:52:42,920 of the single mode of the electromagnetic field 828 00:52:42,920 --> 00:52:46,090 to define two quantities, q and p. 829 00:52:49,110 --> 00:52:51,490 Let me write it in that way. 830 00:52:51,490 --> 00:53:08,580 Omega q, plus ip, is related to a in the following way. 831 00:53:13,870 --> 00:53:18,330 And yes, I was just ranting about this. 832 00:53:18,330 --> 00:53:20,730 v is the volume. 833 00:53:20,730 --> 00:53:24,030 We assume everything happens in a finite volume of space. 834 00:53:24,030 --> 00:53:30,650 Value would say I have two new quantities, q and p. 835 00:53:30,650 --> 00:53:32,680 So I need two equations. 836 00:53:32,680 --> 00:53:37,885 And the two equations involved a and a complex conjugate. 837 00:53:41,190 --> 00:53:45,600 So now we had an expression for the total energy 838 00:53:45,600 --> 00:53:50,760 in terms of the amplitude of the vector potential. 839 00:53:50,760 --> 00:53:53,830 So now I can rewrite it the amplitude square of the vector 840 00:53:53,830 --> 00:53:56,910 potential is a times a star. 841 00:53:56,910 --> 00:54:02,700 And with that I get the total energy 842 00:54:02,700 --> 00:54:07,500 to be proportional to q square plus p square. 843 00:54:07,500 --> 00:54:10,350 And that should remind you, and if everything was set up 844 00:54:10,350 --> 00:54:13,910 to remind you, that this looks like a harmonic oscillator 845 00:54:13,910 --> 00:54:16,420 where q is the position variable. 846 00:54:16,420 --> 00:54:17,930 And p is the momentum variable. 847 00:54:22,740 --> 00:54:24,730 So now, I mean all this is classical. 848 00:54:24,730 --> 00:54:27,720 All this is just clever definitions. 849 00:54:27,720 --> 00:54:30,330 But now we have to do a leap to quantum physics. 850 00:54:30,330 --> 00:54:31,780 We cannot logically derive it. 851 00:54:31,780 --> 00:54:33,140 We have to make a leap. 852 00:54:33,140 --> 00:54:43,034 And the leap is that we postulate that this should now 853 00:54:43,034 --> 00:54:44,950 be described as a quantum harmonic oscillator. 854 00:54:47,710 --> 00:54:50,920 And this transition is done by simply postulating 855 00:54:50,920 --> 00:54:55,210 that the two quantities we have defined 856 00:54:55,210 --> 00:54:58,925 fulfill the canonical commutator for position and momentum. 857 00:55:03,190 --> 00:55:06,910 So we've started with the vector potential, expressed the energy 858 00:55:06,910 --> 00:55:08,890 as a vector potential, and now we 859 00:55:08,890 --> 00:55:12,670 say we recognize through those definitions 860 00:55:12,670 --> 00:55:15,470 that this is an harmonic oscillator with variables q 861 00:55:15,470 --> 00:55:18,606 and p which are defined in terms of the vector potential. 862 00:55:21,360 --> 00:55:25,520 So then you know if you have the quantized harmonic oscillator, 863 00:55:25,520 --> 00:55:30,155 you immediately introduce creation and annihilation 864 00:55:30,155 --> 00:55:30,655 operators. 865 00:55:38,570 --> 00:55:41,930 Which are linear superpositions of q and p 866 00:55:41,930 --> 00:55:44,540 in the following form. 867 00:55:44,540 --> 00:55:48,650 And a dagger has a minus sign here. 868 00:55:48,650 --> 00:55:52,780 And all the prefactors were cleverly set up in such a way 869 00:55:52,780 --> 00:55:55,390 that the commutator of a and a dagger is 1. 870 00:55:59,150 --> 00:56:01,510 And now we can do all the substitutions. 871 00:56:01,510 --> 00:56:05,350 We can express p and q by a and a dagger. 872 00:56:05,350 --> 00:56:09,440 But p and q were related to the vector potential, a. 873 00:56:09,440 --> 00:56:12,970 And the vector potential a square defined the energy. 874 00:56:12,970 --> 00:56:16,130 So now we have an expression for the energy which 875 00:56:16,130 --> 00:56:18,610 is no longer involving a or p and q. 876 00:56:18,610 --> 00:56:20,890 It involves a and a dagger. 877 00:56:20,890 --> 00:56:27,260 And surprise, surprise, we find that our total energy 878 00:56:27,260 --> 00:56:31,040 because we have operators now has become a Hamiltonian, 879 00:56:31,040 --> 00:56:35,190 Has this well-known result with the photon number operator 880 00:56:35,190 --> 00:56:37,870 a dagger, a plus 1/2. 881 00:56:47,080 --> 00:56:52,520 So this is sort of the quickest way which takes us 882 00:56:52,520 --> 00:56:54,860 in a few minutes to the quantized electromagnetic 883 00:56:54,860 --> 00:56:57,180 field. 884 00:56:57,180 --> 00:56:59,930 Of course, all I need is to come back 885 00:56:59,930 --> 00:57:02,480 to spontaneous emission stimulated 886 00:57:02,480 --> 00:57:07,010 emission are the matrix elements of this operator's 887 00:57:07,010 --> 00:57:09,380 a and a dagger. 888 00:57:09,380 --> 00:57:12,510 And this is where, of course, stimulated 889 00:57:12,510 --> 00:57:15,540 and spontaneous emission-- all that comes in. 890 00:57:15,540 --> 00:57:26,720 The non-vanishing matrix elements 891 00:57:26,720 --> 00:57:30,850 in this description of the electromagnetic field 892 00:57:30,850 --> 00:57:33,690 are the ones where a annihilates a photon 893 00:57:33,690 --> 00:57:36,820 and the matrix element is square root n. 894 00:57:36,820 --> 00:57:40,410 Or where a creates a photon, adds a photon 895 00:57:40,410 --> 00:57:43,560 to n photons already present. 896 00:57:43,560 --> 00:57:47,125 And then the matrix element is n plus 1. 897 00:57:50,770 --> 00:57:54,250 OK, so we went from a to q. 898 00:57:54,250 --> 00:57:55,630 And p. 899 00:57:55,630 --> 00:57:59,050 And we went to a and a dagger. 900 00:57:59,050 --> 00:58:04,500 But a is also related to the electric field 901 00:58:04,500 --> 00:58:08,350 by taking the time derivative of the vector potential. 902 00:58:13,990 --> 00:58:17,480 So now, of course, we can go from our expressions 903 00:58:17,480 --> 00:58:20,770 of a and a dagger all the way back. 904 00:58:20,770 --> 00:58:22,940 Just substitute, substitute, substitute. 905 00:58:22,940 --> 00:58:29,220 And find an expression for the electric field 906 00:58:29,220 --> 00:58:30,590 in terms of a and a dagger. 907 00:58:38,740 --> 00:58:50,616 The result is that we have a and here we have a dagger. 908 00:58:50,616 --> 00:58:53,750 We have a polarization vector. 909 00:58:53,750 --> 00:58:59,440 We have the plain wave vector. 910 00:58:59,440 --> 00:59:01,740 And the complex conjugate. 911 00:59:01,740 --> 00:59:05,325 And the complex conjugate of a is a dagger 912 00:59:05,325 --> 00:59:07,650 so the electric field is a superposition 913 00:59:07,650 --> 00:59:09,270 of a and a dagger. 914 00:59:09,270 --> 00:59:12,700 The electric field becomes an operator 915 00:59:12,700 --> 00:59:18,250 which is the sum of creation-annihilation operator. 916 00:59:18,250 --> 00:59:21,850 So with that, we can go back to our Hamiltonian. 917 00:59:21,850 --> 00:59:24,750 Our Hamiltonian for the interaction between light 918 00:59:24,750 --> 00:59:28,640 and atoms in the simplest possible case 919 00:59:28,640 --> 00:59:31,460 was the dipole Hamiltonian. 920 00:59:34,890 --> 00:59:38,320 Which involves a dipole matrix element. 921 00:59:38,320 --> 00:59:40,020 The charge of the electron is negative. 922 00:59:40,020 --> 00:59:42,410 That's why the minus sign has disappeared. 923 00:59:42,410 --> 00:59:45,490 And now all we do is from our treatment 924 00:59:45,490 --> 00:59:47,990 before in the Schroedinger equation where 925 00:59:47,990 --> 00:59:50,420 the electric field was an external field. 926 00:59:50,420 --> 00:59:53,550 Now the electric field becomes the operator 927 00:59:53,550 --> 00:59:55,960 acting on the quantum state of the electromagnetic field. 928 01:00:06,150 --> 01:00:15,000 So by the way, this prefactor here is because the rest of it 929 01:00:15,000 --> 01:00:16,560 is just dimensionless. 930 01:00:16,560 --> 01:00:24,660 This prefactor has, so we have the matrix element here, 931 01:00:24,660 --> 01:00:27,370 this prefactor is an electric field. 932 01:00:27,370 --> 01:00:30,150 And it's something you should always know. 933 01:00:30,150 --> 01:00:33,090 This electric field is actually the electric field 934 01:00:33,090 --> 01:00:34,490 of a single photon. 935 01:00:34,490 --> 01:00:35,980 This is the correct normalization. 936 01:00:35,980 --> 01:00:38,660 If you want to factor out the volume, the frequency, and all 937 01:00:38,660 --> 01:00:41,390 that, you combine these factors in such a way 938 01:00:41,390 --> 01:00:44,830 that it's electric field of a single photon. 939 01:00:44,830 --> 01:00:46,850 Then we have the dipole moment. 940 01:00:46,850 --> 01:00:51,890 And then we have an expression with creation and annihilation 941 01:00:51,890 --> 01:00:59,300 operator over here. 942 01:00:59,300 --> 01:01:02,985 I assume now that the atom sits at r equals 0. 943 01:01:02,985 --> 01:01:06,165 So why should I carry forward an e to the ikr term. 944 01:01:06,165 --> 01:01:09,760 We conveniently place the atoms at r equals 0. 945 01:01:09,760 --> 01:01:14,870 But I have to say a word or two about the e to the i omega 946 01:01:14,870 --> 01:01:16,320 t factor. 947 01:01:16,320 --> 01:01:19,230 I have been deliberately cavalier about my formulation 948 01:01:19,230 --> 01:01:21,900 in quantum physics, of quantum mechanics, 949 01:01:21,900 --> 01:01:24,920 whether I use the Schroedinger or the Heisenberg picture. 950 01:01:24,920 --> 01:01:26,770 And you know in the Schroedinger picture 951 01:01:26,770 --> 01:01:29,250 the wave function is time dependent, not the operator. 952 01:01:29,250 --> 01:01:32,280 In the Heisenberg picture, it's the other way around. 953 01:01:32,280 --> 01:01:34,590 And I have to tell you every time I do a calculation 954 01:01:34,590 --> 01:01:36,760 and look at it, I'm getting confused about the two 955 01:01:36,760 --> 01:01:38,110 pictures. 956 01:01:38,110 --> 01:01:41,900 So anyway, trust me that in this case when 957 01:01:41,900 --> 01:01:44,260 I want to discuss the Schroedinger picture, 958 01:01:44,260 --> 01:01:47,670 the time dependent factor should not be present. 959 01:01:47,670 --> 01:01:50,610 But you really have to look at the derivation 960 01:01:50,610 --> 01:01:53,870 and carefully realize the two are connected 961 01:01:53,870 --> 01:01:55,120 with a unitary transformation. 962 01:01:55,120 --> 01:01:56,703 You really have to figure out in which 963 01:01:56,703 --> 01:01:58,150 [INAUDIBLE] presentation you are. 964 01:01:58,150 --> 01:02:00,670 But I want to not focus on the formality here. 965 01:02:00,670 --> 01:02:02,780 But I'm not carrying forward this factor 966 01:02:02,780 --> 01:02:07,070 because I want to discuss the Schroedinger picture. 967 01:02:07,070 --> 01:02:08,830 OK. 968 01:02:08,830 --> 01:02:11,050 Yes. 969 01:02:11,050 --> 01:02:18,081 So now we can look at the matrix elements of our interaction 970 01:02:18,081 --> 01:02:18,580 Hamiltonian. 971 01:02:21,860 --> 01:02:24,850 And just to be clear, we have written down 972 01:02:24,850 --> 01:02:31,400 this Hamiltonian for just a single mode of the radiation 973 01:02:31,400 --> 01:02:31,900 field. 974 01:02:35,060 --> 01:02:36,920 Depending on what we are interested in, 975 01:02:36,920 --> 01:02:40,350 we may have to sum over many, many modes. 976 01:02:40,350 --> 01:02:48,270 So we are looking at transitions from an initial state 977 01:02:48,270 --> 01:02:50,830 which may be an excited state. 978 01:02:50,830 --> 01:02:54,660 To a final state which may be a ground state. 979 01:02:54,660 --> 01:02:58,220 And since we have quantized the magnetic fields, 980 01:02:58,220 --> 01:03:04,570 we also have to specify the state of the quantum field. 981 01:03:04,570 --> 01:03:09,040 And we assume that the uncoupled Hamiltonian, of course, 982 01:03:09,040 --> 01:03:12,340 has simply number states as eigenstates [INAUDIBLE] photons 983 01:03:12,340 --> 01:03:13,310 and prime photons. 984 01:03:16,540 --> 01:03:26,420 So the only non-vanishing matrix elements are the following. 985 01:03:33,480 --> 01:03:35,880 e is a charge. 986 01:03:35,880 --> 01:03:39,460 e hat is the polarization. 987 01:03:39,460 --> 01:03:43,160 Epsilon 1 is the electric field of a single photon. 988 01:03:43,160 --> 01:03:45,380 And, of course, we only have a coupling 989 01:03:45,380 --> 01:03:47,580 by the fully quantized Hamiltonian 990 01:03:47,580 --> 01:03:50,870 when we have a dipole matrix element connecting 991 01:03:50,870 --> 01:03:51,665 state a and b. 992 01:03:51,665 --> 01:03:53,790 I mean these are all sort of things we have already 993 01:03:53,790 --> 01:03:56,580 discussed in another context. 994 01:03:56,580 --> 01:04:01,750 But now the a's and a daggers which only act on the photon 995 01:04:01,750 --> 01:04:12,480 field, give rise value to two couplings. 996 01:04:12,480 --> 01:04:15,075 One is absorption and one is emission. 997 01:04:17,690 --> 01:04:22,320 Absorption takes place when we look at the matrix element 998 01:04:22,320 --> 01:04:27,410 when the final state has one more photon. 999 01:04:27,410 --> 01:04:34,010 And emission takes the other way around. 1000 01:04:34,010 --> 01:04:38,090 When the final state has one more, which way do we go? 1001 01:04:42,057 --> 01:04:43,140 Let me just write it down. 1002 01:04:43,140 --> 01:04:44,014 And then read it off. 1003 01:04:51,320 --> 01:04:54,390 I think I've inverted, but anyway, initial and final state 1004 01:04:54,390 --> 01:04:58,840 can differ by plus one photon or minus one photon. 1005 01:04:58,840 --> 01:05:01,600 In one case it's absorption, the other case it's emission. 1006 01:05:01,600 --> 01:05:03,660 And the matrix element is n or n plus 1. 1007 01:05:08,640 --> 01:05:11,810 So one is absorption. 1008 01:05:11,810 --> 01:05:12,840 And one is emission. 1009 01:05:17,120 --> 01:05:24,670 So finally if we ask, what are the rates 1010 01:05:24,670 --> 01:05:35,130 of absorption and emission when we 1011 01:05:35,130 --> 01:05:42,940 assume we have a situation where-- and we have now 1012 01:05:42,940 --> 01:05:45,680 discussed the matrix element and this matrix element could 1013 01:05:45,680 --> 01:05:47,930 become the basis of Fermi's Golden Rule. 1014 01:05:47,930 --> 01:05:50,490 We just have to specify time dependent perturbation theory. 1015 01:05:50,490 --> 01:05:54,630 But in any case, whatever we do when we talk about the rate, 1016 01:05:54,630 --> 01:05:57,650 it will involve the matrix elements squared. 1017 01:05:57,650 --> 01:06:04,080 So now we can ask what happens when 1018 01:06:04,080 --> 01:06:10,060 we couple ground and excited states. 1019 01:06:13,140 --> 01:06:16,190 And let's assume we have an excited state. 1020 01:06:16,190 --> 01:06:20,280 And we sum over all possible photon occupation numbers 1021 01:06:20,280 --> 01:06:21,502 of the ground state. 1022 01:06:21,502 --> 01:06:23,710 Well, when we go from the excited state to the ground 1023 01:06:23,710 --> 01:06:29,300 state, there will be only one term contributing to the sum. 1024 01:06:29,300 --> 01:06:33,560 Where we have one photon more because it has been emitted. 1025 01:06:33,560 --> 01:06:37,330 So, therefore, because of the square root n and n 1026 01:06:37,330 --> 01:06:39,710 plus 1 dependence of the matrix element, 1027 01:06:39,710 --> 01:06:44,845 we find that for the processes where photon is emitted, where 1028 01:06:44,845 --> 01:06:47,700 the atomic system gives away a photon, 1029 01:06:47,700 --> 01:06:51,930 the sum of all the possible rates becomes simply n plus 1. 1030 01:06:51,930 --> 01:06:54,161 And in the case of absorption it becomes n. 1031 01:06:57,110 --> 01:07:02,380 So in other words, we have now done the field quantization 1032 01:07:02,380 --> 01:07:05,740 what Einstein pulled out of a thermodynamic equilibrium 1033 01:07:05,740 --> 01:07:06,620 argument. 1034 01:07:06,620 --> 01:07:12,020 Namely that if you have a system that the rate of emission 1035 01:07:12,020 --> 01:07:18,150 versus the rate of absorption is n plus 1 over n. 1036 01:07:18,150 --> 01:07:21,630 But we did not assume any spectral distribution. 1037 01:07:21,630 --> 01:07:23,590 We know this n plus 1 over n applies 1038 01:07:23,590 --> 01:07:27,876 to every single mode of t electromagnetic field. 1039 01:07:40,220 --> 01:07:41,512 Questions about that? 1040 01:07:58,380 --> 01:08:05,360 I also want to tell you, just as a side remark, a lot of people 1041 01:08:05,360 --> 01:08:09,320 think that when emission is n plus 1, 1042 01:08:09,320 --> 01:08:12,150 the plus 1 is different from n. 1043 01:08:12,150 --> 01:08:16,620 That this plus 1 is sort of a spontaneously emitted photon 1044 01:08:16,620 --> 01:08:18,870 which has maybe some random phase. 1045 01:08:18,870 --> 01:08:22,170 And the n which is stimulated photons, 1046 01:08:22,170 --> 01:08:26,319 they go in the same mode as they joined 1047 01:08:26,319 --> 01:08:29,880 sort of the identical to the photons already present. 1048 01:08:29,880 --> 01:08:32,225 I don't see any of that in that treatment. 1049 01:08:35,660 --> 01:08:39,630 So a spontaneously emitted photon 1050 01:08:39,630 --> 01:08:42,170 is identical to the photon which would 1051 01:08:42,170 --> 01:08:43,510 be emitted in a stimulated way. 1052 01:08:46,560 --> 01:08:48,649 You just have n plus 1. 1053 01:08:48,649 --> 01:08:51,370 This is the matrix element for coupling to this mode. 1054 01:08:57,029 --> 01:08:59,990 At some point, spontaneous emission 1055 01:08:59,990 --> 01:09:01,979 can happen in many modes. 1056 01:09:01,979 --> 01:09:04,410 And if it goes to many modes, then there 1057 01:09:04,410 --> 01:09:08,859 is some integral or some summation involved. 1058 01:09:08,859 --> 01:09:11,479 And this can cause a certain randomness. 1059 01:09:11,479 --> 01:09:14,060 But at the level of a single mode, 1060 01:09:14,060 --> 01:09:18,689 I do not see any difference between the one photon 1061 01:09:18,689 --> 01:09:21,790 and the n photons at this level of discussion. 1062 01:09:21,790 --> 01:09:25,040 Just keep that in mind. 1063 01:09:25,040 --> 01:09:27,560 And actually, we'll discuss micromasers. 1064 01:09:27,560 --> 01:09:30,670 You can have put an excited atom in the cavity. 1065 01:09:30,670 --> 01:09:32,750 And you have a fully reversible exchange. 1066 01:09:32,750 --> 01:09:34,510 You spontaneously emit, you absorb. 1067 01:09:34,510 --> 01:09:36,319 You spontaneously emit, you absorb. 1068 01:09:36,319 --> 01:09:39,649 You have Rabi oscillations which involve a single photon. 1069 01:09:39,649 --> 01:09:43,180 And they involve spontaneous emission. 1070 01:09:43,180 --> 01:09:44,380 Fully reversible. 1071 01:09:44,380 --> 01:09:46,184 Completely [INAUDIBLE] evolution. 1072 01:09:49,140 --> 01:09:51,753 So we have 10 minutes left. 1073 01:10:02,400 --> 01:10:06,780 Yes, I think this is just enough to derive for you. 1074 01:10:09,480 --> 01:10:13,250 Now to derive for you using the fully quantized picture. 1075 01:10:15,800 --> 01:10:17,940 To derive flow from first principles 1076 01:10:17,940 --> 01:10:21,060 microscopically an expression for Einstein's a coefficient. 1077 01:10:27,389 --> 01:10:28,930 So in other words, what I'm doing now 1078 01:10:28,930 --> 01:10:31,630 is I really directly calculate for you 1079 01:10:31,630 --> 01:10:33,017 the rate of spontaneous emission. 1080 01:10:33,017 --> 01:10:34,850 And I'm not getting it through the back door 1081 01:10:34,850 --> 01:10:38,580 by treating absorption and then saying, well, 1082 01:10:38,580 --> 01:10:39,990 there's n and n plus 1. 1083 01:10:39,990 --> 01:10:43,302 Or borrowing some argument from Einstein. 1084 01:10:43,302 --> 01:10:44,760 It's such an important quantity, we 1085 01:10:44,760 --> 01:10:47,750 should just hit the system with a Hamiltonian 1086 01:10:47,750 --> 01:10:49,710 and out comes a spontaneous emission rate. 1087 01:10:49,710 --> 01:10:50,927 And this is what we're doing. 1088 01:11:08,830 --> 01:11:12,260 So the starting point is what we have discussed 1089 01:11:12,260 --> 01:11:13,750 at the beginning of the class. 1090 01:11:13,750 --> 01:11:22,470 We want to discuss Fermi's Golden Rule. 1091 01:11:22,470 --> 01:11:25,520 We want to use the rate. 1092 01:11:29,070 --> 01:11:33,090 And to remind you the rate for process 1093 01:11:33,090 --> 01:11:38,170 is the matrix element squared by h plus square. 1094 01:11:38,170 --> 01:11:43,505 And then we have to multiply with the density of states. 1095 01:11:56,990 --> 01:11:59,511 So this is the density of states. 1096 01:11:59,511 --> 01:12:00,260 Pair polarization. 1097 01:12:00,260 --> 01:12:05,240 Actually, I made a few corrections to my notes 1098 01:12:05,240 --> 01:12:07,770 because I realize I have be very, very 1099 01:12:07,770 --> 01:12:10,740 careful in telling you what the states are. 1100 01:12:10,740 --> 01:12:12,850 Because this is what this exercise is about. 1101 01:12:12,850 --> 01:12:17,330 And we are writing it down for one mode by mode. 1102 01:12:17,330 --> 01:12:20,490 So the density of state is now pair polarization. 1103 01:12:20,490 --> 01:12:23,960 We take care of polarizations later. 1104 01:12:23,960 --> 01:12:25,410 Per unit frequency interval. 1105 01:12:41,315 --> 01:12:41,815 Yes. 1106 01:12:57,920 --> 01:13:00,940 So this rate, but now I have to add one caveat. 1107 01:13:00,940 --> 01:13:03,040 I was just thinking how I should express it. 1108 01:13:03,040 --> 01:13:06,350 This rate, if it's all of spontaneous emission, 1109 01:13:06,350 --> 01:13:08,740 is the Einstein a coefficient. 1110 01:13:08,740 --> 01:13:10,300 But there is one caveat. 1111 01:13:10,300 --> 01:13:12,990 And this is the emission of an atom which 1112 01:13:12,990 --> 01:13:15,275 has a dipole moment is not isotropic. 1113 01:13:15,275 --> 01:13:16,650 So I have to be a little bit more 1114 01:13:16,650 --> 01:13:18,130 careful with the solid angle. 1115 01:13:18,130 --> 01:13:20,640 I cannot just calculate a rate and assume everything is 1116 01:13:20,640 --> 01:13:21,460 isotopic. 1117 01:13:21,460 --> 01:13:24,400 If I would do that, I would save a few minutes. 1118 01:13:24,400 --> 01:13:27,760 But I would have really swept something under the rug. 1119 01:13:27,760 --> 01:13:33,280 So what I'm calculating first is the rate in a given unit angle. 1120 01:13:33,280 --> 01:13:36,630 And then I do an integration over the unit angle. 1121 01:13:36,630 --> 01:13:40,720 And eventually I will integrate over the dipole [INAUDIBLE]. 1122 01:13:40,720 --> 01:13:47,510 So, therefore, the density of the photon states 1123 01:13:47,510 --> 01:13:51,190 is sort of photons with their k vectors go into all space, 1124 01:13:51,190 --> 01:13:56,210 but I wanted to have the density of states per unit angle. 1125 01:13:56,210 --> 01:14:08,430 And this quantity is omega square, 8 pi cube, c cube, 1126 01:14:08,430 --> 01:14:13,910 times v. And, of course, if you multiply this by 4 pi, 1127 01:14:13,910 --> 01:14:15,790 you get your normal density of states. 1128 01:14:15,790 --> 01:14:19,500 Because the density of states is isotropic. 1129 01:14:19,500 --> 01:14:21,630 But the rate which we calculate will not 1130 01:14:21,630 --> 01:14:23,775 be isotopic because of the dipole matrix element. 1131 01:14:23,775 --> 01:14:25,540 And the dipole pattern. 1132 01:14:25,540 --> 01:14:29,030 So, therefore, we start with a differential formulation. 1133 01:14:29,030 --> 01:14:31,150 Spontaneous emission per solid angle. 1134 01:14:31,150 --> 01:14:34,650 And then when we do, when we integrate over the solid angle, 1135 01:14:34,650 --> 01:14:37,050 we have to take care of a sine square factor because 1136 01:14:37,050 --> 01:14:40,480 of the dipole pattern. 1137 01:14:40,480 --> 01:14:43,320 Good. 1138 01:14:43,320 --> 01:14:48,015 Now Fermi's Golden Rule takes us from an excited state 1139 01:14:48,015 --> 01:14:50,340 to ground state. 1140 01:14:50,340 --> 01:14:55,030 And since we use the fully quantized treatment, 1141 01:14:55,030 --> 01:15:02,280 our product states of atomic states and photon states. 1142 01:15:02,280 --> 01:15:07,760 And so we assume we start with an atom in the excited states. 1143 01:15:07,760 --> 01:15:13,150 And all modes, mode 1, mode 2, mode 3, are empty. 1144 01:15:16,630 --> 01:15:22,920 And the final state, well, one photon is emitted 1145 01:15:22,920 --> 01:15:25,037 and it can appear in any of the modes. 1146 01:15:25,037 --> 01:15:27,161 And we have to do an integral of all possibilities. 1147 01:15:33,420 --> 01:15:33,960 Good. 1148 01:15:33,960 --> 01:15:38,400 So we did all the work with quantizing 1149 01:15:38,400 --> 01:15:39,810 the electromagnetic field. 1150 01:15:39,810 --> 01:15:44,530 Because we want to calculate those matrix elements. 1151 01:15:44,530 --> 01:15:47,340 Let me just carry over the prefactors, the electric field 1152 01:15:47,340 --> 01:15:48,175 of a single photon. 1153 01:15:53,540 --> 01:15:57,360 Here we have the dipole moment between the polarization 1154 01:15:57,360 --> 01:16:02,480 and the atomic dipole matrix element. 1155 01:16:02,480 --> 01:16:07,170 And now since we are talking about an emission problem, 1156 01:16:07,170 --> 01:16:10,470 we have from the matrix elements squared as we just 1157 01:16:10,470 --> 01:16:13,070 discussed, an n plus 1 factor. 1158 01:16:13,070 --> 01:16:16,420 But the population we start with 0 photons. 1159 01:16:16,420 --> 01:16:20,420 So, therefore, it's just one. 1160 01:16:20,420 --> 01:16:22,300 So all the work we did on quantization 1161 01:16:22,300 --> 01:16:24,610 of the electromagnetic field is that even 1162 01:16:24,610 --> 01:16:27,660 without any photon present, we have a coupling. 1163 01:16:27,660 --> 01:16:31,570 You can say it's a coupling caused by the vacuum which 1164 01:16:31,570 --> 01:16:34,310 is like the coupling we would have gotten 1165 01:16:34,310 --> 01:16:36,386 if we have exactly one photon per mode. 1166 01:16:42,190 --> 01:16:50,450 So let me just write that out. 1167 01:17:14,840 --> 01:17:15,557 Yes. 1168 01:17:15,557 --> 01:17:17,980 I think we can finish that. 1169 01:17:20,810 --> 01:17:26,150 OK, we have now taken care of the matrix element. 1170 01:17:26,150 --> 01:17:30,260 So we insert the matrix element now in our Fermi's Golden Rule 1171 01:17:30,260 --> 01:17:32,035 expression for the ad omega. 1172 01:17:35,250 --> 01:17:40,750 Let me just keep track of all the factors. 1173 01:17:40,750 --> 01:17:42,695 [INAUDIBLE] omega in the matrix element. 1174 01:17:45,750 --> 01:17:50,160 This comes from the electric field of a single photon. 1175 01:17:58,550 --> 01:18:00,700 We have a matrix element. 1176 01:18:00,700 --> 01:18:04,592 Dipole matrix element times polarization. 1177 01:18:04,592 --> 01:18:10,470 And the density of states gives us omega square. 1178 01:18:10,470 --> 01:18:13,930 So see already we'll get a spontaneous emission omega cube 1179 01:18:13,930 --> 01:18:15,110 expression. 1180 01:18:15,110 --> 01:18:19,270 One omega comes because the electric field 1181 01:18:19,270 --> 01:18:22,140 of a single photon, the electric field squared 1182 01:18:22,140 --> 01:18:24,450 of a single photon is proportional to omega. 1183 01:18:24,450 --> 01:18:27,970 And an omega square factor comes from the density of states. 1184 01:18:27,970 --> 01:18:31,220 It's really important to keep that apart. 1185 01:18:31,220 --> 01:18:33,370 The omega 3 dependence has two different sources. 1186 01:18:47,010 --> 01:18:50,180 It's always nice to see that we assumed an [INAUDIBLE] volume 1187 01:18:50,180 --> 01:18:51,150 and it cancels out. 1188 01:18:53,930 --> 01:18:55,970 OK. 1189 01:18:55,970 --> 01:19:12,060 Let me just write it down and then we do the final step. 1190 01:19:12,060 --> 01:19:14,350 So if everything were isotropic, I 1191 01:19:14,350 --> 01:19:15,940 could just multiply with 4 pi. 1192 01:19:15,940 --> 01:19:18,830 And the last factor would be dropped. 1193 01:19:18,830 --> 01:19:22,940 But if you want to go from the spontaneous emission 1194 01:19:22,940 --> 01:19:27,260 per solid angle to the total spontaneous emission, 1195 01:19:27,260 --> 01:19:29,010 we have to average it. 1196 01:19:29,010 --> 01:19:32,380 And what has angular factors is actually 1197 01:19:32,380 --> 01:19:35,460 the projection between the atomic dipole 1198 01:19:35,460 --> 01:19:37,290 moment and the polarization. 1199 01:19:45,570 --> 01:19:48,750 So this is the relevant term. 1200 01:19:48,750 --> 01:19:52,830 And now we have to distinguish. 1201 01:19:52,830 --> 01:19:56,210 There are two polarizations. 1202 01:19:56,210 --> 01:19:59,182 One polarization, the polarization 1203 01:19:59,182 --> 01:20:00,390 when we have a dipole moment. 1204 01:20:00,390 --> 01:20:03,700 And you have light which is polarized in such a way 1205 01:20:03,700 --> 01:20:05,810 that the light goes here. 1206 01:20:05,810 --> 01:20:08,620 This is a dipole moment, the light goes here. 1207 01:20:08,620 --> 01:20:10,640 And now the light which propagates here 1208 01:20:10,640 --> 01:20:13,590 can have a polarization like this. 1209 01:20:13,590 --> 01:20:19,470 Which has a projection of sine theta, with the dipole moment. 1210 01:20:19,470 --> 01:20:22,520 And if the light goes there and the polarization is like this, 1211 01:20:22,520 --> 01:20:24,610 it's orthogonal to the dipole moment. 1212 01:20:24,610 --> 01:20:27,860 So the scalar product is 0. 1213 01:20:27,860 --> 01:20:33,770 So for one polarization, we have a sine theta factor. 1214 01:20:33,770 --> 01:20:39,610 For the second polarization, the scalar product 1215 01:20:39,610 --> 01:20:43,010 for the dipole moment is 0. 1216 01:20:43,010 --> 01:20:49,535 So, therefore, and that's the last conclusion 1217 01:20:49,535 --> 01:20:50,410 I want to draw today. 1218 01:20:55,990 --> 01:21:06,890 Is this integration over the solid angle 1219 01:21:06,890 --> 01:21:12,340 boils down to that we can pull the matrix element out 1220 01:21:12,340 --> 01:21:14,760 of the integral. 1221 01:21:14,760 --> 01:21:16,980 And what is left is the projection factor, 1222 01:21:16,980 --> 01:21:19,960 sine square theta. 1223 01:21:19,960 --> 01:21:24,020 We have to integrate over the whole solid angle. 1224 01:21:24,020 --> 01:21:26,517 And this gives us 2/3. 1225 01:21:30,000 --> 01:21:33,370 So, therefore, our final result is 1226 01:21:33,370 --> 01:21:41,586 that the microscopic expression for the a coefficient 1227 01:21:41,586 --> 01:21:43,210 has its factor of 3 in the denominator. 1228 01:21:43,210 --> 01:21:45,700 And this factor of 3 only comes because I 1229 01:21:45,700 --> 01:21:49,440 correct the average over the dipole pattern. 1230 01:21:49,440 --> 01:21:53,440 Well, then we have 4 pi epsilon 0. 1231 01:21:53,440 --> 01:21:56,430 I mentioned the important dependence 1232 01:21:56,430 --> 01:21:57,708 on the frequency cubed. 1233 01:22:01,100 --> 01:22:06,810 OK, so this is our final result for today. 1234 01:22:06,810 --> 01:22:12,430 And I will discuss next week what are its units? 1235 01:22:12,430 --> 01:22:14,110 How big is it? 1236 01:22:14,110 --> 01:22:17,060 What is the quality factor of the atomic oscillator? 1237 01:22:17,060 --> 01:22:20,970 But we can start next week with this result. 1238 01:22:20,970 --> 01:22:22,820 All right.